ForWhatItsWorth wrote:Tucson,
Recruiting is done by position and grad year. You don't see alot of seniors on the roster at one time because they don't want to have to rebuild the team every year. If a Coach did not believe that a recruit did not have what it takes to play for them they would not have recruited that player. The Coach while recruiting does not only look at your ability to play but your attitude, desire to play the game, willingness to be taught and make changes, how well you get along with your teammates, athletes parent's conduct, etc. The Coach will talk intensly with the ASA Coach and anyone else they feel will give them insight on a recruit. If a Coach asks an athlete to commit after this process they feel you will be a good fit for their team. Sure some girls will not make it at college (homesick, tired of playing, don't like the Coach or teammates, etc.) I believe if this happens that the athlete mostly is at fault. Maybe they should have put as much time in recruiting the college/Coach/teammates as the Coach put into recruiting them.
That last line is golden.
Donnie,
I agree with the other poster about college coaches having to be careful with their rep. I don't think most of them are going to put you up for review every year before honoring the scholarship promise.
Also keep in mind, powerhouse programs like the one your dd is going to, often enjoy a pipeline into a big time Gold program like Impact Gold, Shamrocks, Southern Force, Corona Angels, Firecracker or OC Batbusters. Whatever happens to an alumni of those teams while in college is going to get back to the players and parents in the Gold program. I would think that too many ugly stories would jeapordize that pipeline.
I'm not suggesting the college coaches need to kiss up to these players. But they would probably need to carefully pick their spots when it comes to playing hardball with the scholarship money.