jonriv wrote:jtat32 wrote:Safebyahare wrote:I still don't know doctor. In 2012 I would tell her to let it get deeper. Please dissect.
http://youtu.be/6HkSRr4TOyc
Not sure if you are looking for any kind of genetic analysis, but from what I can gather from the clip I am fairly confident that she has an athletic mother.
ouch

All in good fun, of course.
A few serious points on the discussion:
- At the risk of coming across as a shill, Safebyahare, there is a web-based option for swing analysis - Steve Englishbey's site has this feature. It's subscription-based, but the cost is very reasonable (almost nominal). We've begun using it recently, and have found it to be very helpful. Steve approaches instruction in a different manner than just about anyone, and it takes some effort to get up to speed with him, but it is well worth the effort.
I'm certainly no hitting guru, but I'm going to go ahead and post an observation on the two swings. Both are certainly very good swings and both have a lot of elements that could used as a demonstration for what developing hitters should aspire to. I do see one key difference, though, that I'll point out for the sake of discussion:
The two girls load their lower body differently (for this observation, I'm using the middle clip of swings Jon's DD is taking while wearing a red shirt). Jon's DD is drawing her hips back in a linear direction, and then initiating her swing by driving them forward linearly. At a certain point, she launches a rotational swing and everything looks good from there, but the linear movement adds about four frames of time to her swing. Safebyahare's DD cocks her hips by slightly counter-rotating them. This is a much quicker movement, and as I understand things, a more effective loading of the lower body. A more exaggerated demonstration of this action can be seen in the clips of Michelle Smith at the link Mark posted in another recent thread:
http://imageevent.com/siggy/hitting/oly ... e2.camel_s