anonlooker wrote:Any word on if the games are teeming with college coaches?
This is something I've always wondered about. In today's world with all the hi-tech methods of advertising oneself and the coaches distributing verbals like candy on Halloween, why would they bother with this tournament? Many of these girls are already spoken for and other than an obligatory check on their already wrapped-up player(s), how often is this trip beneficial in finding that diamond in the rough? I'm sure there are some very positive results for some players, but when speaking of it as a large group, I'm not too sure it is worth the coach's expenses.
Seems to me, some would say unfortunately, that many coaches are working the "futures" circuit and watching development of players at the 16U. Even in our states, the local coaches show for the 16s, but rarely the 18s unless checking in on one of their established prospects. Of course, depending on what, if any, action the NCAA takes on "verbals" and the administration of them, this may change in the near future.