by fasterpitch92701 » Tue Aug 05, 2008 2:01 pm
It depends on why you or your team are playing any significant tournament.
If the objective is say or to have "played" or "won" ASA nationals, you play ASA nationals. Saying you "played" ASA nationals is a bit vague as you may have ridden the pine while your team took 144 place out of 144. But, for resume purposes... However, if the objective is to be seen in a competitive environment by college coaches, TC does just as well as ASA or better. Depends on what you want.
From the perspective of a potential coach, do I want to see you play live or see your resume and DVD. I would think the former over the latter.
This may be crass timing but I think of it as something similar to the Olympics. Olympic athletes are great. I think they are wonderful. The competition is great. However, the 104 clowns who own the marketing rights to the name "Olympics" and the 5 ring logo are something often just short of pond scum (IMHO). It's marketing and money. Nothing more or less. Having noted that, there is nothing magical about ASA Nationals other than the competition and the perceived "glory" of the name. Key word; perceived. And by who. That competition could happen anywhere.
If I am a coach, need a third baseman, see an exceptional player at Fireworks or Best of the West or any number of other tourneys, that's a heck of a lot better than getting a canned DVD and a resume that says "played in ASA Nationals".
Depends on what you want... I think the bloom is off the ASA rose. There is no compelling advantage to ASA beyond historical. If a few of the top LA teams don't play ASA nationals the house of cards falls. Unlikely. However, another alternative is that many teams may avoid ASA nationals for better locales, support and organizational capability... and good competition... and the LA folks end up playing with themselves (metaphorically).