Tumblebug wrote:Daylightkate: Glad you got your bat! Enjoy!
Kekambus: Behave, you're representing now . . .
You got it.
Tumblebug wrote:Daylightkate: Glad you got your bat! Enjoy!
Kekambus: Behave, you're representing now . . .
ouch! wrote:any word yet on the Nanotek fastpitch release date?
DunninLA wrote:Tumblebug -- I re-found a website that discusses bat weight, bat speed, the tradeoffs, etc. I haven't had time today to really re-read the sections, but here is one section discussing the tradeoffs between bat speed and bat weight:
http://paws.kettering.edu/~drussell/bats-new/batw8.html
DunninLA wrote:From what I can tell, that is a trick unique to Anderson
Tumblebug wrote:DunninLA wrote:From what I can tell, that is a trick unique to Anderson
It is contrary to the way bats have been sold for the last two decades. The cries of, "Lighter is better" are still echoing on the fields but it is only a narrow look at the whole puzzle. If I can add weight back where it is transparent to the swing, the bat with more mass wins. Adjusting the MOI is how that is done. I'm not smarter or visionary by any means, I just didn't (don't) believe the hype. Wait until you see what we have done with the NanoTek.