Follow
Donate to HeyBucket.com - Amount:

Welcome Anonymous !

Your Fastpitch Softball Bible
 

Fastpitch Discussions

Anderson Bat Q & A

What's on your mind?

by taking2 » Tue Oct 20, 2009 9:58 am

Will the nanotek that is being introduced in 2010 be end loaded like the current rocket tech?

trying to decide if we should buy the rocket tech now or wait for the nanotech.

any opinions...from those in "the know"
taking2
 
Posts: 149
Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 5:46 am

by dittoz » Tue Oct 20, 2009 10:12 am

Steven, this brings up a good question and I suspect you'd be the perfect one to answer it...

This whole issue of cold temps and bats has generated a lot of debate back and forth about using the bats below "X" temperature. Damage to the bats, etc seems to be a recurring theme of the warnings...

Is the cold affecting the bat through some "brittle-ing" of the composite or alloy material, or is the cold making the ball harder which then affects the bat, or is it a combination? I've seen what appears to be valid arguments in both directions and never could get a straight answer.

Appreciate hearing your thoughts on this !


~curt
Being from NorCal, what do I know anyway???
User avatar
dittoz
 
Posts: 590
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2008 10:05 am
Location: Northern CA

by AlwaysImprove » Tue Oct 20, 2009 2:22 pm

Also note, all of the major bat manufacturers have a minimum temperature around 60 degrees on their warranty statements.
User avatar
AlwaysImprove
Premium Member
Premium Member
 
Posts: 1723
Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2009 9:27 am

by Tumblebug » Wed Oct 21, 2009 2:07 pm

dittoz wrote:Steven, this brings up a good question and I suspect you'd be the perfect one to answer it...

This whole issue of cold temps and bats has generated a lot of debate back and forth about using the bats below "X" temperature. Damage to the bats, etc seems to be a recurring theme of the warnings...

Is the cold affecting the bat through some "brittle-ing" of the composite or alloy material, or is the cold making the ball harder which then affects the bat, or is it a combination? I've seen what appears to be valid arguments in both directions and never could get a straight answer.

Appreciate hearing your thoughts on this !


~curt


The answer is a combination of the two. The ball gets significantly harder (and softer) with a relatively small change of temperature. If you made the ball 40 degrees and hit it with a bat that was 70 degrees you'd probably dent the bat. If you made a bat 40 degrees and and hit a ball that was 70 degrees you probably wouldn't dent the bat. The bat starts to become reactive to the cold at about 60 degrees but the change is not significant until about forty-five where it starts to become affected more quickly and under 40 is very brittle. In cold weather below 40, where the bat is cold and hitting a cold ball, you can expect damage to occur.

The ball plays the most significant part in the damage but colder it becomes the bigger part the bat plays.
Tumblebug
 
Posts: 478
Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2009 7:32 pm

by dittoz » Thu Oct 22, 2009 8:25 am

Thanks! So the implied solution to the temperature issue is to consider busting out the junk bats as one plays at temps progressively further below the 60* mark...
Being from NorCal, what do I know anyway???
User avatar
dittoz
 
Posts: 590
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2008 10:05 am
Location: Northern CA

by Tumblebug » Thu Oct 22, 2009 9:13 pm

dittoz wrote:Thanks! So the implied solution to the temperature issue is to consider busting out the junk bats as one plays at temps progressively further below the 60* mark...


Either that or bring a bunch of bats and keep the credit card close to replace the damaged product.
Tumblebug
 
Posts: 478
Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2009 7:32 pm

by fastpitch fool » Wed Oct 28, 2009 4:26 am

Tumblebug - Can you explain the difference between the 2009 and 2010 RTs? My daughter absolutely loves the 2009 RT and has been pretty successful with it. We recently received a 2010 RT on a return swap, and she said it has a different feel to it.

Also, can you give us an update on the NanoTek?

Thanks!!!
fastpitch fool
 
Posts: 100
Joined: Fri Dec 26, 2008 11:22 am

by Tumblebug » Fri Oct 30, 2009 7:44 pm

fastpitch fool wrote:Tumblebug - Can you explain the difference between the 2009 and 2010 RTs? My daughter absolutely loves the 2009 RT and has been pretty successful with it. We recently received a 2010 RT on a return swap, and she said it has a different feel to it.

Also, can you give us an update on the NanoTek?

Thanks!!!


The 2010 is, for the most part, the same piece of equipment except for a aesthetic change, a couple of changes for manufacturability and a little weight loss. The weight loss is probably the difference in "feel" but she only needs to swing the stick for a few BPs to reacquaint herself with that RockeTech feeling.

The NTFP prototypes are in paint. we are still on track for the first quarter of '10 but prolly early in the quarter rather than later. Our Team Anderson girls and sponsored colleges will see the first few for field test in November. The Slowpitch model is getting rave reviews and we most of the kinks worked out there. So look for more news ia a couple of weeks.
Tumblebug
 
Posts: 478
Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2009 7:32 pm

by daylightkate » Sun Nov 01, 2009 8:03 am

Oh pick me pick me.... our team can represent a Canadian evaluation? We'd love to be Team Anderson Girls, The northern version!
daylightkate
 
Posts: 197
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2007 7:51 pm

by CharlieHough » Sun Nov 01, 2009 8:16 am

I am proud to be a Team Anderson Girl....ooops....that didn't come out right.....

It is November.....we, I mean the DD, is ready to field test!
I'm gonna take this right foot, and I'm gonna whop you on that side of your face...and you wanna know something? There's not a damn thing you're gonna be able to do about it!

Billy Jack...1971
User avatar
CharlieHough
 
Posts: 505
Joined: Wed Apr 23, 2008 4:40 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Fastpitch Discussions