Hawk17 wrote:It is always interesting to note that the kids on the losing team were offered a chance to quit the game at half and they said "no." I am pretty sure these kids were not delusional; they knew that the other team was going to continue to score in the second half. But, they continued.
Once again it is the parents trying to "protect" these kids from "psychological" harm. Many modern parents don't want their kids to face ANY adversity or disappointment. We are turning out a generation of kids who can't handle even the least significant or slightest disappointment.
My kids and my teams have been on both sides of lopsided wins. Nine times out of ten, the kids laugh it off and move on. It is how the ADULTS react that is the key. I always try to use it as a learning experience. As I tell kids, if you don't like these losses, GET BETTER!
Was it right for this coach to let the team score 100 points? Who knows. Should the coach be fired? No. Ridiculous.
Here is the scariest thought. Every county athletic director will now want " guidelines" for when the kids should stop shooting baskets, hitting, etc. Just what we need. ( At least the county I work in will now try to institute a " don't be too successful" rule.
You make some good points.
It could be that coach does not represent the values that particular school wants taught as part of its athletic program or representing their school as a whole. It very well could be that he needed to be fired.
I've been on the field with girls getting a drubbing and the girls are cheering, happy, and seemingly oblivious to the score. It does not seem the score affected these girls. It seems like it affected a bunch of people who read about them and certainly affected a bored press.