Sam wrote:Mike,
I appreciate your response, but you should stick to subjects you know. The "so what?" is that, heretofor, this has not happened in women's college softball. Minus a coaching change after the verbal offer, verbals were figuratively etched in stone....a mutual respect thing....an unwritten code between the coaches. Looks like its going to be open season now.
Because I don't agree with your side of the issue I don't know anything about the subject matter? I think it is absolutely amazing how many people get stereotyped and others on a list just fall into line. Yeah, I'm an umpire, but does that mean I haven't been involved with two brothers, a sister, daughter and son in the collegiate recruiting process? I come into contact with NCAA coaches on a regular basis.
You are correct, many coaches
choose to avoid contacting players who have already "committed" to a team. That doesn't mean they will not listen if the player contacts them. To be honest, it may be as much of a mutual fear than respect thing. However, that doesn't mean everyone plays nice all the time.
Team chemistry changes all the time. A coach may have thought there was a need for a slapper in a couple years only to find out s/he had more prospects than could be played and cut the least diserable loose. Remember, a "verbal" may be made at any time.
"Verbals" are nothing more than someone looking for a way to beat the system. If the coaches were truly "honorable", they wouldn't even acknowledge something which has no other purpose than to circumvent the system in place to keep everyone honest, including softball coaches.
The first shoe to drop will be interesting. Who will be the first school to accept a kid who backs out on their verbal?
Seems to me, that situation has already been noted in this thread. And it must be true or it wouldn't be on here, right?
