Follow
Donate to HeyBucket.com - Amount:

Welcome Anonymous !

Your Fastpitch Softball Bible
 

Fastpitch Discussions

Tips for hitting the "rise ball..."

What's on your mind?

by Sam » Tue Jan 13, 2009 4:38 pm

GIMNEPIWO wrote:Back in the day ... The King and His Court ( Feiner ) would come through once in a while ... Each team in the Adult league got to nominate 1 player for an All Star Team to get their Gluteus Maximus's handed to them by the shorthanded Court ... 1 year, our nomination actually doubled off Feiner and he drank for free all night ...


The team I put together to face the King and His Court actually beat them 4-1.
Run your mouth when I'm not around
Its easy to achieve
You cry to weak friends that sympathize
- Pantera, Walk
User avatar
Sam
Premium Member
Premium Member
 
Posts: 3174
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 8:22 am
Location: Norco, California

by jag1 » Tue Jan 13, 2009 5:15 pm

with all due respect to everyone who's taken the time to post on this thread........I was really looking for some insight on .........................what the he$*....nevermind..!!lol! :lol:
jag1
 
Posts: 246
Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2008 9:18 am

by GIMNEPIWO » Tue Jan 13, 2009 5:49 pm

Sam wrote:
GIMNEPIWO wrote:Back in the day ... The King and His Court ( Feiner ) would come through once in a while ... Each team in the Adult league got to nominate 1 player for an All Star Team to get their Gluteus Maximus's handed to them by the shorthanded Court ... 1 year, our nomination actually doubled off Feiner and he drank for free all night ...


The team I put together to face the King and His Court actually beat them 4-1.


He must not have been pitching from 2nd base blind-folded that night ... LMAOWIOAB!
"For the strength of the pack is the wolf, the strength of the wolf is the pack" Rudyard Kipling
User avatar
GIMNEPIWO
 
Posts: 4339
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 6:58 am
Location: Between Rock & Hard Place

by Sam » Tue Jan 13, 2009 6:52 pm

GIMNEPIWO wrote:
Sam wrote:
GIMNEPIWO wrote:Back in the day ... The King and His Court ( Feiner ) would come through once in a while ... Each team in the Adult league got to nominate 1 player for an All Star Team to get their Gluteus Maximus's handed to them by the shorthanded Court ... 1 year, our nomination actually doubled off Feiner and he drank for free all night ...


The team I put together to face the King and His Court actually beat them 4-1.


He must not have been pitching from 2nd base blind-folded that night ... LMAOWIOAB!


No, Eddie only pitched the first inning. Rich Hoppe pitched the rest of the game.
Run your mouth when I'm not around
Its easy to achieve
You cry to weak friends that sympathize
- Pantera, Walk
User avatar
Sam
Premium Member
Premium Member
 
Posts: 3174
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 8:22 am
Location: Norco, California

by GIMNEPIWO » Tue Jan 13, 2009 6:58 pm

Is Eddies son still touring with the team ?... I thought I heard that he took over in the last few years B-4 Eddie died ... and the "King" would just come out and throw a few novelty pitches ...
Last edited by GIMNEPIWO on Wed Jan 14, 2009 5:18 am, edited 1 time in total.
"For the strength of the pack is the wolf, the strength of the wolf is the pack" Rudyard Kipling
User avatar
GIMNEPIWO
 
Posts: 4339
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 6:58 am
Location: Between Rock & Hard Place

by wadeintothem » Tue Jan 13, 2009 7:03 pm

ssarge wrote:
It's not people that need convincing.

It's video cameras filming riseballs in profile that aren't convinced. It's the computer software used to track the flight trajectory of the ball that isn't convinced. It's gravity that isn't convinced. It's the study that shows a ball spinning beyond the the limits of human capability and still not "hopping" above it's original trajectory, that isn't convinced.


Well said.

And I would add that of the list presented, PEOPLE are the only example that can actually be tricked by illusion. This possibility HAS to at least be CONSIDERED, or so you would think.

And yet SOME PEOPLE continue to state / believe that it is the video and physics which are "tricks," and that their eyes - viewing from a SINGLE one of the many available angles - have it right.

And not only that, they disparage others who choose to present the evidence. Not REFUTING the evidence - how could they - but simply inferring anyone who believes it is a moron.

It's why I love PEOPLE. We're an amazing bunch.


As for the point that it is a "riseball" because it crosses the plate at a greater elevation from the ground than when released, yeah, THAT'S what people mean when they describe a riseball hopping over a bat or climbing up the strike zone.


First off, no high road for your side.

Where is this alleged evidence? It sure isnt on that NASA thread. Where are these alleged video's from profile proving no movement? All thats been presented is the following:

A very weak link, a few "b-b-b-but s-s-s-sarge saiddd....."' cheerleaders and a token name caller who probably wouldnt know a rise ball if it landed on him, let alone how to throw or judge one.

The one single link of alleged evidence, a self proclaimed buddy of "Nasa smart guy" with a link explaining HOW a baseball DOES curve, and some funky math that is in turn used to allegedly prove a rise ball cannot rise. By extension, you should also be arguing there is no movement in softball at all. Ironically, you arent using the same math to prove that a softball curveball doesnt curve. I suppose that is to not get laughed off the board.

My intuition and experience tells me movement is much more difficult with a softball than with a hardball. In fact, and I've said it before, even at the highest levels through 16U, discernible movement is rare, usually relegated to a very few pitchers. 12-14U.. maybe 1 pitcher in a tournament. MAYBE. Last Fresno Force, which was the only time I saw top 12U's from behind the plate, I dont think I saw a single 12U pitcher with movement. Some good location, but nothing spinning. I reported that at the time. It doesnt happen with 12Us.

By 14's and 16's in baseball, you will be getting much more movement than in softball.

I have nothing proving this, but this is my view point and my experience.

So I understand that movement with a softball does require significant spin, and especially younger ages, simply cannot do it. A lot of the cheer leaders here likely have truely not seen movement pitches simply because of the level of pitches they watch.

Now if your math, by some unprovable miracle, is even close ... I highly suspect the model it is based on would essentially equate to a softball being shot out of a level tube and how much spin would be required... as opposed to mathematically taking into account pitching mechanics and mechanics of the hand, arm, hips, follow through, body shape, position at release, and the trained muscle memory earned after years to get the pitch just right. How could it?

Softballs have movement. Some have significant movement. I've seen a few male and female junkballers that I would say defy any math, logic, and reason. Yes, for the under-50 IQ brigade , I would consider these pitchers to be magicians. They take you out of your shoes. Maybe some just havent seen the movement as I have, or maybe they are stuffing their face with a hot dog, or yapping. But I'm watching these pitches from MANY angles, and yes, they move.
But there is one born every minute.. and I guess this phony math proving nothing and with no supporting evidence is able to sucker people out of what they should go and just simply watch for themselves. Thrown by the right pitcher correctly, Curveballs curve, riseballs rise, drop balls drop.. and that other stuff they do.. the change up that floats and dances like a bugs bunny cartoon.. yeah I dunno how they do it, but I have seen it.
ASA, NCAA, NFHS
User avatar
wadeintothem
 
Posts: 1726
Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2008 8:44 pm

by DonnieS » Tue Jan 13, 2009 7:25 pm

>> I highly suspect the model it is based on would <<

Wade, unless I missed something, no one is arguing that there is no movement. I watch a game or two myself and rarely see a pitcher anymore that does not have movement, sometimes, significant movement. Curves, screws, real drops (as opposed to the gravity drops), gravity drops, name them.

But the model the rise ball test was based on was a very good college pitcher. She was/is a very successful rise ball pitcher - they filmed from several angles with the purpose of proving that the rise ball does 'break' up, that is the ball rises up above a straight line between pitcher and catcher. I have seen several very good men who threw what I would have sworn to as balls that break up. But both the math involved that proved that the spin required to 'break' up was not humanly possible and the video proved that the ball did not break up, it may have not descended as much from gravity as it should have.

But if you want to believe the ball breaks up, its ok. Changes nothing.
User avatar
DonnieS
Premium Member
Premium Member
 
Posts: 3694
Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 5:27 pm

by wadeintothem » Tue Jan 13, 2009 7:26 pm

Demonboy wrote:
It's not people that need convincing.

It's video cameras filming riseballs in profile that aren't convinced. It's the computer software used to track the flight trajectory of the ball that isn't convinced. It's gravity that isn't convinced. It's the study that shows a ball spinning beyond the the limits of human capability and still not "hopping" above it's original trajectory, that isn't convinced.

Well hell, I had no idea.

You know, every since I saw forest gump shake JFK's hand, I gotta see it for myself. No internet buddies of nasa guys or animated pujols gifs convince me of anything.

Lets see your evidence.
ASA, NCAA, NFHS
User avatar
wadeintothem
 
Posts: 1726
Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2008 8:44 pm

by DonnieS » Tue Jan 13, 2009 7:36 pm

wadeintothem wrote:
Demonboy wrote:
It's not people that need convincing.

It's video cameras filming riseballs in profile that aren't convinced. It's the computer software used to track the flight trajectory of the ball that isn't convinced. It's gravity that isn't convinced. It's the study that shows a ball spinning beyond the the limits of human capability and still not "hopping" above it's original trajectory, that isn't convinced.

Well hell, I had no idea.

You know, every since I saw forest gump shake JFK's hand, I gotta see it for myself. No internet buddies of nasa guys or animated pujols gifs convince me of anything.

Lets see your evidence.



Wade, the test was two years ago as I recall, the pitcher was Sarah Pauly, Scott Sarginson, a travel coach from California and Sarah's dad Rick, a pitching coach were the ones involved. It was written up on eteamz - maybe some clever person can find the thread. I think the test started with all 3 believing that it did break and wanting to prove it.
User avatar
DonnieS
Premium Member
Premium Member
 
Posts: 3694
Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 5:27 pm

by wadeintothem » Tue Jan 13, 2009 7:41 pm

DonnieS wrote:>> I highly suspect the model it is based on would <<

Wade, unless I missed something, no one is arguing that there is no movement. I watch a game or two myself and rarely see a pitcher anymore that does not have movement, sometimes, significant movement. Curves, screws, real drops (as opposed to the gravity drops), gravity drops, name them.

But the model the rise ball test was based on was a very good college pitcher. She was/is a very successful rise ball pitcher - they filmed from several angles with the purpose of proving that the rise ball does 'break' up, that is the ball rises up above a straight line between pitcher and catcher. I have seen several very good men who threw what I would have sworn to as balls that break up. But both the math involved that proved that the spin required to 'break' up was not humanly possible and the video proved that the ball did not break up, it may have not descended as much from gravity as it should have.

But if you want to believe the ball breaks up, its ok. Changes nothing.
'

Seems to me they were using math to prove a softball cannot generate enough spin to cause a pitch to break and transferring that to the rise ball.
Last edited by wadeintothem on Tue Jan 13, 2009 8:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
ASA, NCAA, NFHS
User avatar
wadeintothem
 
Posts: 1726
Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2008 8:44 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Fastpitch Discussions