by dittoz » Thu Apr 03, 2008 11:22 am
Good subject...
My father-in-law who is a lifelong baseball coach at the LL level has always maintained that FP softball needs to grow the size of the field. If you have a whiz-bang pitcher, chances are you're going to own the better part of the game, especially at the younger levels. We've debated the point endlessly and I honestly don't think that from a pitching standpoint, it's any different than baseball. Pitching owns the game until hitters are old enough to catch up to them.
If you look at an elite BB pitcher they're throwing in the 90-95 MPH range from 60'
If they let go of the ball approx 5 feet in front of the rubber and the ball is traveling 139 ft/sec, the hitter has approx .39 secs to hit it. A FP pitcher throwing 65-70 MPH from 43' strides out about 8' and then lets go of the ball another foot out so the release point is approx 37'. Speed is about 100 ft/sec and allows about .37 secs. Not much of a difference.
Looking at the field, a softball doesn't go as far as a baseball and proportionately, I think there are about as many HR's in FP as there are in BB. Not that BB should set the benchmark, but nobody talks about changing the dimensions of a BB field (except maybe in SF when Bonds was there...)
In any sport there will always be the standouts. 10u players hitting out of a 200' field is not the norm any more than 10u players who are 5'8 and weigh 150 lbs. Sure they're out there, but it's not typical.
I vote that things stay the same.
Being from NorCal, what do I know anyway???