I found an interesting statement in the Clemens Report (An Analysis Of The Career Of Roger Clemens, by Hendricks Sports Management, LP, Hendricks/Mann/Larson-Hendricks, 1/28/2008)
"Since the introduction of the designated hitter rule in the American League (A.L.) in 1973, which substitutes a hitter for the pitcher in the batting order, run production has naturally been higher in the A.L. than in the National League (N.L.). In fact, the N.L. ERA has been lower in each and every year since 1973. This gives N.L. pitchers a systemic advantage over their A.L. counterparts in raw ERA. A simple way of correcting for this advantage when comparing the ERAs of pitchers from different leagues is to determine the difference between the N.L. and A.L. ERAs and deduct that difference from all A.L. pitchers' ERA."
Now I know this does not have much to do with softball but it raised the question to me - are softball teams hindered by not having dedicated pitchers and dedicated hitters? If a team does not have dedicated pitcher/hitter, are they losing their competitive advantage? This is doable in college, US Team, and NPF.



























