Follow
Donate to HeyBucket.com - Amount:

Welcome Anonymous !

Your Fastpitch Softball Bible
 

The Umpire Corner

Illegal Sub or Batting Out of Order

Rule question? Get it answered here.

by Jalamander » Tue Jul 28, 2009 3:59 pm

I leave u trip to you guys, but as a point of clarification for ASA... Flex batting for anyone other than the DP (in this case Flex is batting for batter #1) is covered by its own rule outside of the BOO rules and that is 4-7-F-2.


Nit-picking... I think you meant 4-6-F-2.
4-7 deals with coaches.
Jalamander
 
Posts: 91
Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2009 9:37 am

by SoCalASABlue » Tue Jul 28, 2009 6:15 pm

I thought there might be a separate rule for the DP-Flex scenario but did not find it in my quick search of the rulebook this afternoon.

Thanks for the lesson, Wade and Jalamander.
User avatar
SoCalASABlue
 
Posts: 394
Joined: Wed Jul 08, 2009 7:02 pm

by SoCalASABlue » Tue Jul 28, 2009 6:38 pm

PDad;

Although Wade and Jalamander already provided the correct ASA rule citation for the OP's Dp-Flex scenario, in the case of an incorrect (NOT ILLEGAL) batter batting out of order, Rule 7-2-D2 seems pretty clear to me. It clearly states "...after the incorrect batter has completed a turn at bat AND BEFORE a legal or illegal pitch to the following batter or before the pitcher and all infielders have vacated their normal fielding positions and have left fair territory...and any run scored shall be nullified. All outs stand."

"Completed a turn at bat" has to mean either getting on base or making an out, regardless of how many pitches it takes to do either one.

Therefore:
(1) if a run scored on a wild pitch during the incorrect batter's at-bat;
(2) the incorrect batter makes the third out, regardless of how many pitches it takes to do it;
(3) the defensive coach PRIOR TO PITCHER AND INFIELDERS LEAVING FAIR TERRITORY appeals that the third out was an incorrect batter and the run that scored must be nullified.

Seems to me that Rule 7-2-D2 requires the run to be nullified, regardless of the fact that the pitcher may have thown 20 additional pitches to the incorrect batter before getting the out. The defense cannot be penalized with a run caused by an illegal batter that made the third out. Would it be called that way? Probably not. But 7-2-D2 seems to be one of the most straightforward rules in the entire rulebook - no wiggle room that I can see. It would be different (see rule 7-2-D3) if the incorrect batter was not the third out and the pitcher threw a legal or illegal pitch to the next batter. In that case, it's too late to appeal.

But as I have stated in previous posts, I do not have the field experience of Wade or DTR, and probably do not have as much field experience as Jalamander. I am always trying to improve my knowledge and application of the ASA rules, so I am open to any additional help any of the more experienced umps can provide.
User avatar
SoCalASABlue
 
Posts: 394
Joined: Wed Jul 08, 2009 7:02 pm

by MTR » Tue Jul 28, 2009 7:18 pm

wadeintothem wrote:obviously me and jalamander were typing at the same time.. Jalamander is correct and this is not BOO.


But it is not an unreported substitute, either.
MTR
 
Posts: 2317
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 5:21 am

by Jalamander » Tue Jul 28, 2009 9:42 pm

But it is not an unreported substitute, either.

MTR, I appreciate your comment, but it's rather short. Do you agree it is not a BOO?
You say it is not an unreported substitute?
You have a player, batting in the number 1 spot, who is not one of the first nine players listed on the roster. As I read the OP, the OM did not approach the PU with a substitution.
Could you please explain what you have on this OP?

Jalamander
Jalamander
 
Posts: 91
Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2009 9:37 am

by Jalamander » Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:49 am

Jalamander wrote:
But it is not an unreported substitute, either.

MTR, I appreciate your comment, but it's rather short. Do you agree it is not a BOO?
You say it is not an unreported substitute?
You have a player, batting in the number 1 spot, who is not one of the first nine players listed on the roster. As I read the OP, the OM did not approach the PU with a substitution.
Could you please explain what you have on this OP?


Now I understand better. On another thread MTR and PDad explained that I have missed the ASA 2009 rule change for 4-6-C, removing the disqualification portion of the rule.. In the OP this would be an illegal player...not a BOO...and not an unreported sub.
Jalamander
 
Posts: 91
Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2009 9:37 am

by MTR » Wed Jul 29, 2009 4:16 pm

Jalamander wrote:Could you please explain what you have on this OP?

Jalamander


From the ASA July 2009 Plays and Clarifications

Play: This is a Fast Pitch game and the Team batting last gives a properly filled out line-up to the Plate Umpire, with the DP batting in the 7TH position and the Flex correctly listed in the 10TH position. In the bottom of the 4TH inning with one out, the 9TH batter, (B9), comes up and flies out for the second out of the inning. The next batter comes to the plate and grounds out to the Shortstop for the third out of the inning. Before the defense leaves the field, the opposing coach tells the Plate Umpire that the person who just batted was the Flex. The Plate Umpire confirms that the Flex just batted. What will be the result of the coach’s inquiry to the Umpire?

Ruling: When the FLEX batted in the 1st position in the batting order, (the DP is batting in the 7th position), they batted “for someone other than the original DP”. This makes the FLEX an ILLEGAL BATTER according to Rule 4, Section 6F[2]. The Flex is then disqualified and the offending team must put a substitute in for the FLEX or simply activate the DP on defense for the FLEX and drop down to 9 players on the Line-up card. Rule 4, Section 6F[2] ILLEGAL BATTER (Fast Pitch). Placing the “FLEX” player in one of the first nine positions in the batting order for someone other than the original DP. EFFECT: Section F[2-4] The illegal Player is disqualified and replaced with a legal substitute. All other provisions of Rule 4, Section 6 A-C [1-9]apply.

The FLEX is never "in" the batting order, so she cannot be "out of order".
MTR
 
Posts: 2317
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 5:21 am

by PDad » Thu Jul 30, 2009 1:50 pm

SoCalASABlue wrote:PDad;

Although Wade and Jalamander already provided the correct ASA rule citation for the OP's Dp-Flex scenario, in the case of an incorrect (NOT ILLEGAL) batter batting out of order, Rule 7-2-D2 seems pretty clear to me. It clearly states "...after the incorrect batter has completed a turn at bat AND BEFORE a legal or illegal pitch to the following batter or before the pitcher and all infielders have vacated their normal fielding positions and have left fair territory...and any run scored shall be nullified. All outs stand."

"Completed a turn at bat" has to mean either getting on base or making an out, regardless of how many pitches it takes to do either one.

Therefore:
(1) if a run scored on a wild pitch during the incorrect batter's at-bat;
(2) the incorrect batter makes the third out, regardless of how many pitches it takes to do it;
(3) the defensive coach PRIOR TO PITCHER AND INFIELDERS LEAVING FAIR TERRITORY appeals that the third out was an incorrect batter and the run that scored must be nullified.

Seems to me that Rule 7-2-D2 requires the run to be nullified, regardless of the fact that the pitcher may have thown 20 additional pitches to the incorrect batter before getting the out. The defense cannot be penalized with a run caused by an illegal batter that made the third out. Would it be called that way? Probably not. But 7-2-D2 seems to be one of the most straightforward rules in the entire rulebook - no wiggle room that I can see. It would be different (see rule 7-2-D3) if the incorrect batter was not the third out and the pitcher threw a legal or illegal pitch to the next batter. In that case, it's too late to appeal.

But as I have stated in previous posts, I do not have the field experience of Wade or DTR, and probably do not have as much field experience as Jalamander. I am always trying to improve my knowledge and application of the ASA rules, so I am open to any additional help any of the more experienced umps can provide.

I checked with an authority on ASA rules since I haven't seen a response from Wade, MTR or Jalamander. Here is his response:

We don't have a CBP for this, unfortunately.

However we can read the intent of the rule another way.

If batting out of order is discovered:
1. While the incorrect batter is at bat:
EFFECT: The correct batter must take the batter’s position and assume
the balls and strikes count. Any runner advanced and runs scored
while the incorrect batter was at bat shall be legal.

and we have CBP 7.2-7 that deals w/ a runner stealing home while we have a BOO at bat, appealed and the proper batter takes his place, the advance is legal because the BOO "did not assist nor advance R1." "The advance was made on it's own merit"

Now I know this isn't the same, however 7-2-d-b has been instructed to us that advancement of the runner must happen because of something that the BOO did, it does not apply to the whole batting experience and what happened during numerous pitches before something completed their turn at bat. If it did what would you do with bases loaded, 2 or 3 IPs (in FP) or 2 or 3 stolen bases in SP and then a single or a K by the BOO. Are you going to reload the bases after they make an appeal? I guess someone could say yea we're going to do that but I disagree and I think most senior umpires disagree.

This umpire not only has a District UIC but a state UIC, I believe he needs to contact either or both for the proper inter of 72db.
User avatar
PDad
Premium Member
Premium Member
 
Posts: 3439
Joined: Sun Mar 29, 2009 4:52 pm

by Jalamander » Thu Jul 30, 2009 5:42 pm

This is very long. Sorry. :shock:
SoCalASABlue wrote:PDad;
Rule 7-2-D2 seems pretty clear to me. It clearly states "...after the incorrect batter has completed a turn at bat AND BEFORE a legal or illegal pitch to the following batter or before the pitcher and all infielders have vacated their normal fielding positions and have left fair territory...and any run scored shall be nullified. All outs stand."

"Completed a turn at bat" has to mean either getting on base or making an out, regardless of how many pitches it takes to do either one.

Therefore:
(1) if a run scored on a wild pitch during the incorrect batter's at-bat;
(2) the incorrect batter makes the third out, regardless of how many pitches it takes to do it;
(3) the defensive coach PRIOR TO PITCHER AND INFIELDERS LEAVING FAIR TERRITORY appeals that the third out was an incorrect batter and the run that scored must be nullified.

Seems to me that Rule 7-2-D2 requires the run to be nullified, regardless of the fact that the pitcher may have thown 20 additional pitches to the incorrect batter before getting the out. The defense cannot be penalized with a run caused by an illegal batter that made the third out. Would it be called that way? Probably not. But 7-2-D2 seems to be one of the most straightforward rules in the entire rulebook - no wiggle room that I can see. It would be different (see rule 7-2-D3) if the incorrect batter was not the third out and the pitcher threw a legal or illegal pitch to the next batter. In that case, it's too late to appeal.

SoCalASABlue,
Rule 7-2-D is sequential. You have to look at it as a timeline of events.
7-2-D(1) covers that time period when the incorrect batter is at bat.
7-2-D(2) covers that time period when the incorrect batter has completed his at bat.
7-2-D(3) covers that time period when the incorrect batter has completed his at bat and some other event has occurred. (ie, a pitch to another batter, an inning change-over)

Because they are time sequenced, you cannot inter-mix the rule effects.
7-2-D(1) If the incorrect batter is discovered, you can put the correct batter in the batter's box without penalty. Any runs scored or outs made while the incorrect batter was in the batter's box is legal. They stand.

7-2-D(2) If the incorrect batter is discovered after he has completed his at-bat. That means he must have reached base somehow or put out somehow. At that moment in time, if a runner advanced or scored, they have to go back. If the incorrect batter got on base, he is removed and the correct batter is called out. Any outs made stand.

7-2-D(3) If a pitch is made, or an inning change-over, the incorrect batter's time at-bat is now legal. All outs made or runs scored will stand.

So:
(1) if a run scored on a wild pitch during the incorrect batter's at-bat;

Rule 7-2-D(1) applies. If incorrect batter is discovered during that time period covered by 7-2-D(1), replace with correct batter and score the run on the wild pitch.

(2) the incorrect batter makes the third out, regardless of how many pitches it takes to do it;

Rule 7-2-D(2) applies. If the incorrect batter is discovered during that time period covered by 7-2-D(2), the out he made stands. If there was movement on the bases, they must return to their bases, which nullifies any runs. Any outs made to those base runners stand.

(3) the defensive coach PRIOR TO PITCHER AND INFIELDERS LEAVING FAIR TERRITORY appeals that the third out was an incorrect batter and the run that scored must be nullified.

Rule 7-2-D(2) applies. If the incorrect batter is discovered prior to a pitch or the inning change-over, the out he made stands. Any runs made in that time period covered by 7-2-D(2) are nullified. Any outs made on the bases stand.

Seems to me that Rule 7-2-D2 requires the run to be nullified, regardless of the fact that the pitcher may have thown 20 additional pitches to the incorrect batter before getting the out.

Don't mix 7-2-D(1) and 7-2-D(2). If a run scored during the incorrect batter's at-bat rule 7-2-D(1) and only 7-2-D(1) applies…that run stands.

Hope this helps

Jalamander
Jalamander
 
Posts: 91
Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2009 9:37 am

by Crabby_Bob » Thu Jul 30, 2009 11:10 pm

MTR wrote:From the ASA July 2009 Plays and Clarifications

[snip for brevity]

The FLEX is never "in" the batting order, so she cannot be "out of order".


True, but aren't the consequences if she reaches base similar to BOO (4.6.C.3 & 4 and EFFECT)?

Regarding the scenario you posted, are there any consequences for the player in the #1 slot? Has she burned her re-entry? Thanks.
A constitution of government, once changed from freedom, can never be restored. Liberty once lost is lost forever.
User avatar
Crabby_Bob
 
Posts: 209
Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2009 11:36 am

PreviousNext

Return to The Umpire Corner