wadeintothem wrote:Skarp wrote:lol...you guys crack me up. The OP didn't name anyone. Didn't even identify a location. He just brought up situations which may as well have been pure hypotheticals. But in Umpireland it's not even permissible to hypothetically criticize umpires.
Hell, he didn't even criticize anyone. He merely asked a question. Get over yourselves already.
Relax, no one jumped on the OP and his alleged incidents and alleged umpire.
For all we know, this is just sour grapes. I mean after all, there isnt a SINGLE experienced umpire who hasnt heard these same accusations when you watched the entire play. We were nice enough to even give him the benefit of the doubt and take his post at face value despite parental and coach proclivities at gross exaggeration.. what more do you want Mr. Johnny Cochran of Heybucket? An e-greet sympathy card for the OP?
Right. It's always sour grapes and gross exaggeration when someone on here suggests that an umpire may have been less than perfect.
How many times have you and/or MTR belittled someone for relating their personal observation--whether or not you were even in the same state as the actual event? It's comical really. I can almost predict the verbiage of your response when I read the OP.
Absent knowledge to the contrary, why not try giving someone the benefit of the doubt. Maybe your "sour grapes" assumption doesn't apply to everyone. After all, if the glove don't fit, you must acquit.