Comp wrote:As long as B1 still had a legal re-entry, it was not an illegal substitution, it was just an unreported substitution. If she still had her re-entry, it would be an out, B1 now re-entered into the lineup.
SnocatzDad wrote:Comp wrote:As long as B1 still had a legal re-entry, it was not an illegal substitution, it was just an unreported substitution. If she still had her re-entry, it would be an out, B1 now re-entered into the lineup.
True for NFHS but i think per ASA 4.6.b Unreported treated same as illegal player which means it's an out and B1 is disqualified and no longer an elligible sub
Bretman wrote:First things first...maybe this player really was an illegal substitute. The OP isn't clear that she wasn't. But if she was actually an unreported sub, then that's another kettle of fish.
- An illegal sub and and unreported sub are two completely different things covered by different rules.
- As noted, different sanctioning bodies treat these violations differently- which just adds to the confusion.
- ASA dropped the disqualification penalty for an unreported sub several years ago. An unreported sub on offense is called out, but they remain in the game.
- To answer your question "What is the penalty for an illegal substitution?"...batter would be called out and ejected.
FastpitchFan08 wrote:R1 would have been eligible to re-enter if properly reported. I assume that is what would make her an unreported sub as opposed to an illegal sub?
Bretman wrote:- ASA dropped the disqualification penalty for an unreported sub several years ago. An unreported sub on offense is called out, but they remain in the game.