georgiascout wrote:Watched a High School game last week that offered a questionable ruling.
Bases Loaded with Two Outs
Batter rips a basehit to outfield and the Runners at 3B and 2B both score, giving this team the final lead in the game.
PROBLEM... Runner from 3B goes HM to score and Runner from 2B misses 3B and continues HM to score.
Missed Base was Appealed and was confirmed by Umpire. Runner was called Out but he allowed the scored run from the Runner from 3B.
My Question,,,, Why wasn't it treated as a Force Out thus negating the scoring run since it was the third out.
Had this been the Hitter missing 1B and continuing to 2B, I believe that would have been declared the third out and negated any runs being scored,
In the play you describe, it is absolutely a force out (R2 forced to 3rd by result of B becoming a BR); if that was the 3rd out, no runs can score on that play.
Thought you were about to rehash missed base appeal I had just last night at another GHSA game (Harrison/Hillgrove). I know the Hillgrove coaches have called everyone they know trying to get someone to agree with them.
Runners on 1st and 3rd, 1 out. Fly to right center, 1st base coach tells R2 (runner on 1st) to go. She touches 2nd as CF makes a great catch, runs around second on the way back to 1st safely. Meanwhile, R1 (runner on 3rd) easily tags and scores.
After play ends, Hillgrove coach calls time, and (dead ball appeal) appeals R2 missing 2nd on the way back. Appeal upheld (by me); coach says "no runs scores". Nope, not a force out, timimg play, runs scores. He still doesn't get it. Oh, and he KNOWS that isn't right in baseball, either.
This in top of 1st; he loses 10-9 in 8 innings, but this ruling apparently cost them the game.
(For those not knowing, no protests allowed in GHSA games; but, he would obviously lose anyway.)