Follow
Donate to HeyBucket.com - Amount:

Welcome Anonymous !

Your Fastpitch Softball Bible
 

The Umpire Corner

ASA numbering requirements

Rule question? Get it answered here.

by slapperdad » Fri Sep 14, 2012 5:11 am

Under ASA code, is 01 and 1 the same number? NF rule book is pretty explicit that they are.
Every man lives by a code:
1.Always look cool
2.Never get lost
3.If you get lost, look cool
User avatar
slapperdad
 
Posts: 887
Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 7:28 pm

by PDad » Fri Sep 14, 2012 12:36 pm

Some of the automated scorekeeping software won't distinguish them. The software PGF used, Pointstreak, didn't store "00" accurately.

Are you trying to accomodate two # 1's so neither one has to change numbers? Does either of them have a pole barn? ;)
User avatar
PDad
Premium Member
Premium Member
 
Posts: 3439
Joined: Sun Mar 29, 2009 4:52 pm

by UmpSteve » Fri Sep 14, 2012 1:36 pm

Spazsdad wrote:They were at one time but the rule was changed and they are now considered different numbers.


And reasonably so. The numbers are intended to provide a means of identification different from other players on the team, while maintaining some decorum (no fractions, decimals, pi, etc.). The fact of mathematical equivalency doesn't detract from meeting that intent.

At the time that rule changed (maybe 10 years ago), no one considered how a computer program might address it. It would be, in fact, such an easy fix for the programmers, to make that field a numerical label rather than a number, that no one should consider that a major reason to not allow it.
User avatar
UmpSteve
Premium Member
Premium Member
 
Posts: 461
Joined: Fri Aug 21, 2009 10:38 am

by MTR » Fri Sep 14, 2012 5:09 pm

UmpSteve wrote:
Spazsdad wrote:They were at one time but the rule was changed and they are now considered different numbers.


And reasonably so. The numbers are intended to provide a means of identification different from other players on the team, while maintaining some decorum (no fractions, decimals, pi, etc.). The fact of mathematical equivalency doesn't detract from meeting that intent.

At the time that rule changed (maybe 10 years ago), no one considered how a computer program might address it. It would be, in fact, such an easy fix for the programmers, to make that field a numerical label rather than a number, that no one should consider that a major reason to not allow it.


I still think there was some NASCAR influence there ;)
MTR
 
Posts: 2317
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 5:21 am

by slapperdad » Sun Sep 16, 2012 8:27 pm

Nothing to do with players, these were extra unis for the occasional pick up player with a team full of Basketball stars ;)
Every man lives by a code:
1.Always look cool
2.Never get lost
3.If you get lost, look cool
User avatar
slapperdad
 
Posts: 887
Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 7:28 pm


Return to The Umpire Corner

cron