Interference was ruled? Unless the BR did something to purposely interfere, I dont agree with the call. F6 was not in the act of fielding a batted ball, and was not in posession of the ball. That would make F6 guilty of obstruction if they hindered the advance of the BR.
Well, that's what I thought, too.
What game was this and is there any video of the play?
There is video, but the collision is off camera, so I have to go by what I was told.
What college team positions F6 on the inside of the diamond between 3rd & home for the cut off on a ball hit to the fence in left center ?
Good Question - I don't have an answer since the video is shot from CF and all I can see is runners scoring. NOt sure where F6 was initially set up and how she ended up in the base path of BR.
You guys have answered my fundamental question - absent a deliberate action by BR, it doesn't sound like INT. I'll have to see if I can learn more from someone at the game.