YellowBalls wrote:Bracket - expand on what you mean by exposure and reputation in 12U. First, CTS is 14U and this pitcher, although a 96 should be considered for the division in which she plays - 14U. Yes, she is getting recognized as a top "12U" pitcher, but shouldn't she be placed into the 14U discussions instead?
The pitchers playing for CA96 and Firecrackers already have reputations of being good but are you saying they are not recognized as much because they are already supported with good defense and expected to be good (i.e. not developing?) or because the CTS pitcher stands out on team or? Kind of confused on your point there, sorry it's been a long day!
No problem. I am not sure where the CTS pitcher belongs, this past weekend she pitched three games in one day in the 12u age bracket - while the CTS 14u team played in the other division!
Realistically knowing Stan (who runs CTS), the 96’ pitcher will most likely play in 12u come ASA time. Why? CTS has very good 14u players, the SS is great, and the pitching is solid – but does Stan really believe the 12u pitcher playing up will make his 14u team a “match” for Victory Campbell 14u (2nd place ASA nationals), Corona Angles 94 (3rd place at Nationals) & Lakewood/Firecrackers 94 (1st place Nationals), So Jets (1st ASA state) and Wildcats 94 (top three at ASA state)…. All returning 14u Teams! No way …! I know Campbell’s 14u team has played and beat some top 18U gold teams (top as in top 20 finishers at 18U Gold Nationals). A 96’ pitcher will not put you over the top with that group.
In the end, my money is on Stan building a team around the 96 pitcher in 12u! The 1-0 lost to PowerSurge 96 ensures me that 2-3 solid players moving to CTS can make them a serious contender. The only thing stopping CTS from being a serious contender is Stan’s past history of ducking the top ASA teams. If Stan puts out that his goal is ASA Nationals and signs up for Fresno Classic, OC friendlies and the other key ASA tournaments he will be able to complete with any 96 team!
Now comparing the pitchers is hard, but realistically the Firecrakers 96 are an offensive team… they are going to score runs .. so pitching for them is less stressful then pitching for CTS! Example: This past weekend the CTS 96 pitcher gave up a home run in the game against the OC Crush and CTS lost 1-0. Do you see the pattern CTS loses 1-0 all the time. How many runs would the Firecrackers 96 put up against OC Crush? There is no contest pitching for CTS is much harder and takes a different mind set then pitching for the Firecrackers and CA 96….. ask the famous college pitcher from Univ Texas about the pressure of pitching with no offensive support!
Also remember that the pitchers that have offensive support benefit from the opposing batters believing that they have to score a lot of runs to win. When teams play the CTS (pitcher led type of teams) batters are only looking for one big hit and only need 1 run to win. So your 3-4-5 batters can go 1-15 and you win against CTS.
The pitchers for the Firecrackers, CA 96, etc are all developing… they are learning how to lead a team with very high expectations and the pressure that beings with it. So they are gaining confidence and the mound presence/leadership needed to succeed at the higher levels. The CTS pitcher does not exist in a world of “Win ASA Nationals in 2009” or bust …. So she will have to learn how to deal with high expectations and pressures later! But she does have an opportunity to develop one heck of an “out” pitch!
What would be interesting is to track the strikeout per 6 innings and the strikeout-to-hard hit ratios of the different pitchers. Who in 12u leads in strikeouts? I am not sure!