This is a great topic and one I've thought about many times. As a parent who has had a daughter on 3 of those large organizations (1 was very brief), the differences are night and day.
In my perception, Org "A" has very little leadership, no team-to-team communication, every team is on their own, and no effort to increase the strength of the organization. As a side note, I've personally heard from 2 college coaches (1 of those an assistant) that they will no longer recruit out of this organization.
Org 2, it's all about the girls and building the teams stronger. Continuing education, innovative idea's and training, good communication, and several in-house recruiting opportunities. Great feeder program for the older teams.
Org 3 was brief, but I sure like where they were heading. Lots of good things starting and it will pay them ten-fold in the next few years.
I don't pretend to know what it takes to run a large organization, but it's VERY obvious which ones work and which don't. I'm sure they all put in a ton of time, but I think their time is spent on different things from organization to organization. It's also interesting to see the juggle between having control over the group vs guiding the group.


























