Skarp wrote:G, you have an unfortunate penchant for avoiding meaningful discourse about the policies of the party you support (or actions of the politicians therein) by flippantly referencing the policies/actions of those on the right. I understand the allure of that strategy, since defending liberal policies on their merits is not an enviable task, but it's fallacious, obfuscatory, and entirely unhelpful.
As for how Obama got into Columbia and HLS, I can answer that very easily. He benefited from huge considerational advantages by virtue of the color of his skin, and if his personal finances were an issue both of those schools opened up their prodigious wallets and made that issue go away. Just like they do for any black or Hispanic candidate who shows the slightest bit of promise that he/she can survive (not thrive) in those academic environs.
er ... uh ... OK ... I was just making a joke about Obama, Hillary and McCain in response to a post ... but when challenged about what my McCain joke was referencing, I replied ... And in support of McCains patriotism ... When questioned again I googled an answer ...
You have the unforunate penchant for thinking I'm deeper than I actually am ... So no, I don't like much of what I see happening now, but seldom do ... not really a ground breaking stance, but that is it ... The only President I ever liked was Reagan ... And I know you will say otherwise and that's fine, but I do not support any party ... I support canidates based on who I think will screw things up the least ... Sometimes those canidates are more conservative than I like and sometimes they are more liberal than I like ... Sometimes they've ( hopefully ) inhaled !
