With that being said.... I "Like" all previous posts on THIS subject!!!!!

BTW... GO BRONCOS!!!

jefe wrote:there was a beef about the % of teams that won based on the flip, regardless of home or away. its exactly that to avoid a cheap or long game finisher on the opening possession of OT.
GIMNEPIWO wrote:jonriv wrote:Both teams are guaranteed a possession, unless the first team score with a touchdown. Broncos scored a touchdown, game over.
So the possession by the kicking team is only guaranteed if the first team scores a FG on their first possession ? Guess I had it wrong all year ...
Battle wrote:GIMNEPIWO wrote:jonriv wrote:Both teams are guaranteed a possession, unless the first team score with a touchdown. Broncos scored a touchdown, game over.
So the possession by the kicking team is only guaranteed if the first team scores a FG on their first possession ? Guess I had it wrong all year ...
Yeah...Umm...I think...![]()
Actually, the key word is have the "opportunity" to possess the ball.
Interesting note...If the kicking team decides to on side kick and recovers the ball then the recieving team has had their opportunity to possess the ball and the first one to score wins.
If the recieving team fumbles the ball and the kicking team recovers then it is the same as above.
G, you didn't have it wrong because the rule only applies to post season as of now although that could change in the near future.
As for Tebow, he was the most overrated QB in college and is the most underrated in the NFL...That's got to be some kind of record...
sofbal1234 wrote:Before I add a response to this post I need to clear the air on my reply to Black widow's post last week (figured i'd let the smoke clear before I explained). I never once said I agreed to her post denouncing our military or country! I was just "SHOCKED & AWED" that she had the "BALLS" as a female to post something like that on a public forum!!! She went a little overboard executing her 1st amendment rights but was just expressing what millions of americans (NOT ME) don't have the "BALLS" to do. Therefore I said I "loved it"!!!!!! No other misconstrued reasons!!!!!!
With that being said.... I "Like" all previous posts on THIS subject!!!!!
BTW... GO BRONCOS!!!
GIMNEPIWO wrote:sofbal1234 wrote:Before I add a response to this post I need to clear the air on my reply to Black widow's post last week (figured i'd let the smoke clear before I explained). I never once said I agreed to her post denouncing our military or country! I was just "SHOCKED & AWED" that she had the "BALLS" as a female to post something like that on a public forum!!! She went a little overboard executing her 1st amendment rights but was just expressing what millions of americans (NOT ME) don't have the "BALLS" to do. Therefore I said I "loved it"!!!!!! No other misconstrued reasons!!!!!!
With that being said.... I "Like" all previous posts on THIS subject!!!!!
BTW... GO BRONCOS!!!
I am not sure why many have refered to BW as a she or a her or a female ... Aside from his avatar, I don't believe that I've seen any indication that he is a she ...
Spazsdad wrote:Other than the fact that "she" usually only post her rants about once a month![]()
![]()
GIMNEPIWO wrote:Spazsdad wrote:Other than the fact that "she" usually only post her rants about once a month![]()
![]()
With 5 DD's and my Mate ... That makes 6 periods a month that I had to endure ... It may not be a record, but I had little sympathy for those who only have 1 a month ...