Follow
Donate to HeyBucket.com - Amount:

Welcome Anonymous !

Your Fastpitch Softball Bible
 

The Pub

Tale of Two Houses

Off topic. Home for jokes and other misc. stuff.
Keep it reasonable.

by GIMNEPIWO » Sun Jan 03, 2010 12:32 pm

It seems that there is alot on the internet about this " Tale of Two houses " ... It appears that at the time that this story started circulating ( early to mid 2000's ) that the numbers were correct ... The Gore supporters seem to want to offset the numbers by stating that the power company that the Gores get their service from uses green energy ... in any event, although they keep home offices, it does seem that for a residence, they use a sh*t load of power ... Since the story, the Gores have made imrovements to their power consumption ... but not to the extent that the Bush's have with the geo-thermal ... here are two links, one from the green side and one from Fox ...
http://www.thedailygreen.com/environmen ... e-47062202
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,254908,00.html

Or to put it in the words of Dubya ;
They misunderestimated me. The California crunch really is the result of not enough power-generating plants and then not enough power to power the power of generating plants. Natural gas is hemispheric. I like to call it hemispheric in nature because it is a product that we can find in our neighborhoods. I know the human being and fish can coexist peacefully. I think if you know what you believe, it makes it a lot easier to answer questions. I can't answer your question. Rarely is the question asked: Is our children learning?
"For the strength of the pack is the wolf, the strength of the wolf is the pack" Rudyard Kipling
User avatar
GIMNEPIWO
 
Posts: 4339
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 6:58 am
Location: Between Rock & Hard Place

by NewCoach » Sun Jan 03, 2010 8:21 pm

Although GWB could butcher the language, he didnt use it to decieve people. I was never in question on where he stood on an issue.

GWB promoted domestic energy production. Al Gore promotes us living without energy. The Bush admin. was throughly hammered for bringing major domestic energy producers into the White House and asking how America could produce more. Al Gore was given an Oscar for producing a movie the British court system has called a falsehood.


I have seen many more wind farms going up in my part of the country in the last 6-8 years than I ever did during the Clinton-Gore admin. I dont know if they are subsidised or not, but they are there. I cant cite a number by how much, but natural gas production is way up in the last 6-8 years, a much cleaner form of fuel for both homes and power plants. Again I dont know if N.G. is being subsidised or if the increase is due to market forces.

Talk (and doculies) are cheap. Getting something done about a problem, although hard, is worth the effort.
Luck is simply preparation meeting opportunity
NewCoach
 
Posts: 155
Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2008 4:01 pm

by Skarp » Sun Jan 03, 2010 11:50 pm

NewCoach wrote:Although GWB could butcher the language, he didnt use it to decieve people. I was never in question on where he stood on an issue.

That's because he is a fundamentally decent human being. Bad president on most counts, but a good man.

Did anyone else see the documentary film about GW's reelection campaign? It was told from the perspective of a young, liberal, female member of the press corp that traveled with him during the campaign, and contains an illustrative vignette. As she tells it, at one point she has just written a scathing and fairly personal attack on GW in her paper...something she admits is over the top for someone granted her degree of access...and she is fearful of reprisal by him. Not only that, other members of the press corp begin to distance themselves from her to avoid collateral damage. Bottom line, GW can freeze her out in a second, and wouldn't be blamed by anyone for doing so. Her career is in jeopardy.

So what does GW do? The next time he comes out to meet the press, he makes a point to stop and chat with her personally. He needles her about the article with self-deprecating humor, and make her and everyone else feel completely at ease. He consciously reaches out and extricates her from a difficult situation, even though she has just attacked him and essentially declared herself as his enemy. That was her analysis.

Can anyone picture Clinton (either one) or Obama doing the same? No way. They keep their lists and check them twice...or forward them to the FBI or IRS, as the case may be...

Liberals love to mouth the platitude that you can measure your own humanity and decency by how you treat your enemies. Well on that score GW was a saint. Libs...not so much.
There is no charge for awesomeness
...or attractiveness.
User avatar
Skarp
Premium Member
Premium Member
 
Posts: 3141
Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2007 6:10 pm

by Joe » Mon Jan 04, 2010 7:29 am

Skarp wrote: Bad president on most counts,....


Compared to who? Clinton, Carter, Obama? Or do you want to go further back to Grover Cleveland?
Joe
 
Posts: 2393
Joined: Thu Jul 24, 2008 5:25 pm

by GIMNEPIWO » Mon Jan 04, 2010 8:32 am

Joe wrote:
Skarp wrote: Bad president on most counts,....


Compared to who? Clinton, Carter, Obama? Or do you want to go further back to Grover Cleveland?


Skarp did not say he was the one and only bad President ... :lol: ... In hindsight, most people see 20/20 ... And Joe, you have made your point repeatedly about Dubya's job being to protect the country post 9-11 ... there is much truth to that ... and we will never know if a different President would have done better to protect us in the days leading up to it or directly afterwards ... It was in fact a new ball game ... But, didn't Bush recieve a briefing over one month prior to 9-11 advising him that attack was imminent ? There is a world of info on-line and elsewhere that point to Dubya's shortcomings.
http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/blogs/chan ... 2928.shtml
Last edited by GIMNEPIWO on Mon Jan 04, 2010 12:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"For the strength of the pack is the wolf, the strength of the wolf is the pack" Rudyard Kipling
User avatar
GIMNEPIWO
 
Posts: 4339
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 6:58 am
Location: Between Rock & Hard Place

by carolinafan » Mon Jan 04, 2010 11:51 am

Skarp wrote:
Can anyone picture Clinton (either one) or Obama doing the same? No way. They keep their lists and check them twice...or forward them to the FBI or IRS, as the case may be...

Liberals love to mouth the platitude that you can measure your own humanity and decency by how you treat your enemies. Well on that score GW was a saint. Libs...not so much.


I was wondering what you base this on? Do you know for a fact that all Dems "keep their lists and check them twice ....or forward them to the FBI or IRS, as the case may be...."? Just trying to get some facts here.....but I do like that GWB made that reporter feel comfortable after writing a critical piece on his presidential abilities. I give credit when credit is due.....do you Skarp and Joe? EVER?
carolinafan
 
Posts: 181
Joined: Mon May 04, 2009 8:11 am

by Joe » Mon Jan 04, 2010 3:27 pm

carolinafan wrote: I give credit when credit is due.....do you Skarp and Joe? EVER?


Yes, I appreciated Clinton helping me explain the the meaning of oral sex to my 11 year old.
Joe
 
Posts: 2393
Joined: Thu Jul 24, 2008 5:25 pm

by GIMNEPIWO » Mon Jan 04, 2010 4:16 pm

Spazsdad wrote:
I give credit when credit is due.....do you Skarp and Joe? EVER?

As soon as Obama, Pelosi, Reid, Frank, and Dodd do anything worthy of praise I will be sure to give them an 'atta boy


How is the economy doing out your way ? ... Here it appears, I hope ( knocking vigorously on wood ), that the worst is behind us ... when the economy recovers, most economists believe it will be long slow going ... but WHEN it does recover, will you give Obama an 'atta boy' ? ( providing of course that it does recover during his administration )
"For the strength of the pack is the wolf, the strength of the wolf is the pack" Rudyard Kipling
User avatar
GIMNEPIWO
 
Posts: 4339
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 6:58 am
Location: Between Rock & Hard Place

by Dugout Dad » Tue Jan 05, 2010 9:42 am

Here is an obama check list to keep track of his achievements, feel free to check any additional boxes
check list1.jpg
check list1.jpg (32.82 KiB) Viewed 3115 times
Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy.
Sir Winston Leonard Spencer Churchill (1874-1965)

You can understand capitalism when you realize that Thomas Edison improved the world more than Karl Marx
Me
User avatar
Dugout Dad
 
Posts: 2334
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2008 11:46 pm

by Skarp » Tue Jan 05, 2010 4:31 pm

carolinafan wrote:I give credit when credit is due.....do you Skarp and Joe? EVER?

I gave Obama credit when he called Kanye West a jackass...even defended him against folks who called that "unpresidential."

And I'll give Clinton credit right now for recognizing that his own utopian visions were out of step with mainstream opinion, and for tacking back to the center. Yes, he did it because he's a power-grubbing political whore, but that's my kind of liberal. Much better than the principled liberal we currently have, who's hell bent on forcing socialism upon us whatever the cost.

I'm uniformly critical of Obama because his policies are uniformly abysmal. If he changes any of them, I'll give him credit for doing so.
There is no charge for awesomeness
...or attractiveness.
User avatar
Skarp
Premium Member
Premium Member
 
Posts: 3141
Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2007 6:10 pm

PreviousNext

Return to The Pub