fastpitchdad05 wrote:Just in case my dear, dear friend ATWT comments I just want to state that I hope it was clear that I was in no way indicating that the 1% should be taxed more than anyone else. My comments are all about them hopefully deciding on their own to share more of their wealth with those that helped them attain that wealth.
For the 1%, that would be Wall Street, lobbyists, tax accountants and lawyers. Is that what you really want?
I suspect what you really want is for corporations to eschew some of their profits in favor of compensating their employees better. That would be well and good for privately held firms, but it's not realistic for public corporations whose stock is held directly and indirectly by a broad spectrum of individuals. Would you be happy if your retirement account took a hit because of it? How long do you think a CEO would last after that?
BTW, the sources of info for the video are a mixture of 2 different things, income and wealth, and the video doesn't do a very good job of distinguishing between them.



























