Follow
Donate to HeyBucket.com - Amount:

Welcome Anonymous !

Your Fastpitch Softball Bible
 

The Pub

AUSTRALIA - THE VOICE OF MODERATION

Off topic. Home for jokes and other misc. stuff.
Keep it reasonable.

by Little Bird » Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:34 pm

Do people choose their political affiliations according to the way they naturally act, or do people act the way they think their political stereotype is supposed to act?
Is a question not the most humble form of communication? I'll accept any answer, regardless of what it is.
User avatar
Little Bird
 
Posts: 87
Joined: Wed Apr 01, 2009 11:25 am

by rediman » Thu Apr 23, 2009 9:20 pm

Little Bird wrote:Do people choose their political affiliations according to the way they naturally act, or do people act the way they think their political stereotype is supposed to act?



I believe Sir Winston Churchill said it best, " If you're not a liberal when you're 25, you have no heart. If you're not a conservative by the time you're 35, you have no brain".
rediman
 
Posts: 43
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 7:38 am

by GIMNEPIWO » Fri Apr 24, 2009 4:43 am

rediman wrote:
Little Bird wrote:Do people choose their political affiliations according to the way they naturally act, or do people act the way they think their political stereotype is supposed to act?



I believe Sir Winston Churchill said it best, " If you're not a liberal when you're 25, you have no heart. If you're not a conservative by the time you're 35, you have no brain".


... and if you can't think for yourself by the time your 45 ? ...
my point is not directed at anyone ... I'm just observing that peeps get caught in a rut of either 'liberal' or 'conservative' ... when in fact, shouldn't ALL issues be debated on their own merit ? ... I do not consider myself either, though while living in NJ we were considered 'conservative', but by moving 437 miles to Virginia must have turned us into 'radical liberals' somehow ... I believe Donnie pointed out something earlier about the early post 9-11 days ... I think a quick pole of the country would have had us at about 97% 'conservatives' ...
The WMD thing and the invasion of Iraq ... in hind-sight ... I'm not so sure that there were not other agenda's in place ... but at the time, I was backing the administration ...
"For the strength of the pack is the wolf, the strength of the wolf is the pack" Rudyard Kipling
User avatar
GIMNEPIWO
 
Posts: 4339
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 6:58 am
Location: Between Rock & Hard Place

by jofus » Fri Apr 24, 2009 8:41 am

Little Bird wrote:Do people choose their political affiliations according to the way they naturally act, or do people act the way they think their political stereotype is supposed to act?


I am who I am, to quote Popeye. I act the way that I think I should act, and more importantly, the way I want my children to act (monkey see monkey do). I definitely won't let some elected politician tell me how I should think.

I agree with G, every idea should be evaluated on it's own merit, but sadly, our political structure has evolved to the point where that isn't possible, at least not for our politicians.
Proud fastpitch, baseball, volleyball, soccer, basketball, etc. Dad :)
User avatar
jofus
 
Posts: 708
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 11:01 am

by Joe » Fri Apr 24, 2009 8:58 am

Little Bird wrote:Do people choose their political affiliations according to the way they naturally act, or do people act the way they think their political stereotype is supposed to act?


Little Turd...

Hmmm...let me ponder this a bit more....hmmmm...

...Ahhh, I thinks you a fool for forgettin' what you saw on da TV on a Tuesday morning in September, 2001...the 11th. The Bush man did what we axed of him...protect us. And that he did.

All the other turdlettes you're letting loose...are just the crap that allowed 9/11 to happen from our first Black prez...Clinton, the fornicator in chief.
Joe
 
Posts: 2393
Joined: Thu Jul 24, 2008 5:25 pm

by Little Bird » Fri Apr 24, 2009 9:16 am

Joe wrote:
Little Bird wrote:Do people choose their political affiliations according to the way they naturally act, or do people act the way they think their political stereotype is supposed to act?


Little Turd...

Hmmm...let me ponder this a bit more....hmmmm...

...Ahhh, I thinks you a fool for forgettin' what you saw on da TV on a Tuesday morning in September, 2001...the 11th. The Bush man did what we axed of him...protect us. And that he did.

All the other turdlettes you're letting loose...are just the crap that allowed 9/11 to happen from our first Black prez...Clinton, the fornicator in chief.


Joe "Blows", it was just a general question, are you really that stupid?
Is a question not the most humble form of communication? I'll accept any answer, regardless of what it is.
User avatar
Little Bird
 
Posts: 87
Joined: Wed Apr 01, 2009 11:25 am

by Skarp » Fri Apr 24, 2009 9:26 am

GIMNEPIWO wrote:
rediman wrote:
Little Bird wrote:Do people choose their political affiliations according to the way they naturally act, or do people act the way they think their political stereotype is supposed to act?



I believe Sir Winston Churchill said it best, " If you're not a liberal when you're 25, you have no heart. If you're not a conservative by the time you're 35, you have no brain".


... and if you can't think for yourself by the time your 45 ? ...
my point is not directed at anyone ... I'm just observing that peeps get caught in a rut of either 'liberal' or 'conservative' ... when in fact, shouldn't ALL issues be debated on their own merit ? ... I do not consider myself either, though while living in NJ we were considered 'conservative', but by moving 437 miles to Virginia must have turned us into 'radical liberals' somehow ... I believe Donnie pointed out something earlier about the early post 9-11 days ... I think a quick pole of the country would have had us at about 97% 'conservatives' ...
The WMD thing and the invasion of Iraq ... in hind-sight ... I'm not so sure that there were not other agenda's in place ... but at the time, I was backing the administration ...

The reason that the dichotomy exists, and is so uniform from person to person, is that liberalism and conservatism proceed from very different basic assumptions about the human condition, and about the way the world works. These assumptions lead inexorably to two sets of internally consistent, and diametrically opposed, conclusions. So-called independents--those whose "on the merits" policy preferences are all over the map--simply haven't thought their positions through very well.

A quick poll of the country post 9/11 would have revealed a solid core of left-wing moonbats (more commonly known as the Democratic base) who thought the U.S. had this coming, or thought that the attack was actually orchestrated by Bush, etc., and weren't about to support ANY serious American response. And in fact, the Dems, while voting to authorize the use of force for election purposes, were working overtime to undermine Bush the entire time. They know their base very well.

As far as alternate agendas, what, pray tell, might those have been?
There is no charge for awesomeness
...or attractiveness.
User avatar
Skarp
Premium Member
Premium Member
 
Posts: 3141
Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2007 6:10 pm

by Joe » Fri Apr 24, 2009 9:37 am

Little Bird wrote:are you really that stupid?


Yes, Little Turd...I'm pretty stupid...however not stupid enough to quote the company line from the likes of Move-on, Soros, MSNBC, NY Times, Chavez, Fidel......want me to keep going?
Joe
 
Posts: 2393
Joined: Thu Jul 24, 2008 5:25 pm

by Little Bird » Fri Apr 24, 2009 10:00 am

Joe wrote:
Little Bird wrote:are you really that stupid?


Yes, Little Turd...I'm pretty stupid...


So...that makes you stupid and honest, right?

Joe wrote:however not stupid enough to quote the company line from the likes of Move-on, Soros, MSNBC, NY Times, Chavez, Fidel......want me to keep going?


No "Blow", no need to keep going off on any tangents, didn't you already answer my question?
Is a question not the most humble form of communication? I'll accept any answer, regardless of what it is.
User avatar
Little Bird
 
Posts: 87
Joined: Wed Apr 01, 2009 11:25 am

by Joe » Fri Apr 24, 2009 10:11 am

Little Bird wrote:So...that makes you stupid and honest, right?


Me... stupid and honest? I'll take that, thank you...

Little Turd...stupid, blind, gullible, dishonest...an idiot? Perhaps...
Joe
 
Posts: 2393
Joined: Thu Jul 24, 2008 5:25 pm

PreviousNext

Return to The Pub