Sequestration

[fastpitchdad05]

A lot of what you say makes sense, but

emotions are getting in the way.....

I'm pretty sure I won't last if my CEO finds out I'm on HeyBucket!

Is he part of the evil 1%?

ATWT - Why do you feel that the 1% is evil? Please explain...

S - A - R - C - A - S - M
I used pretty cupcake colors

Seems appropriate for you, thanks.

Oh the irony...

[Safebyahare]

ATWT and FSTP05 you two are the gift that keeps giving.

[Safebyahare]

Dugout Dad, have you seen this and what do you think about it?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QPKKQnijnsM

DD wrote:

Okay, I watched it - some thoughts:
What a load of crap......
What people earn is fair. If Kobe Bryant has greater wealth it’s because he earns it. The fair distribution of wealth is not an abstract idea or image; fairness is not equality of outcome. Giving people who earn less more by taking away from people who earn more is not fairness. It is tyranny
Funny how this video fails to show the “redistribution of wealth” through tax revenue. So the video is technically incomplete, but I’ll give it a "C" for Communism.
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

This must be from Stanford, the problem with the study is,,,
Makes wealth or money a zero sum game. Meaning to obtain wealth you must take away someone elses wealth.
So what they are implying is the wealth factor never changes. aka the sum of money is the same today as it was in 1960.
Now doesn't a rising tide of the economy raise all boats?? or just the rich??? mmm
What the liberal profesor has done, is make you think with envy like they do.
Also we are wealthier today as a nation than ever before, our standards of living cannot compare to the 1960's.
Is the new thing going to be,,,,"these people are too big to fail"
Quick looking at other peoples plate, and be thnkful for what is on yours. You want more,,,earn it.

[Dugout Dad]

Dugout Dad, have you seen this and what do you think about it?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QPKKQnijnsM

DD wrote:

Okay, I watched it - some thoughts:
What a load of crap......
What people earn is fair. If Kobe Bryant has greater wealth it’s because he earns it. The fair distribution of wealth is not an abstract idea or image; fairness is not equality of outcome. Giving people who earn less more by taking away from people who earn more is not fairness. It is tyranny
Funny how this video fails to show the “redistribution of wealth” through tax revenue. So the video is technically incomplete, but I’ll give it a "C" for Communism.
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

This must be from Stanford, the problem with the study is,,,
Makes wealth or money a zero sum game. Meaning to obtain wealth you must take away someone elses wealth.
So what they are implying is the wealth factor never changes. aka the sum of money is the same today as it was in 1960.
Now doesn't a rising tide of the economy raise all boats?? or just the rich??? mmm
What the liberal profesor has done, is make you think with envy like they do.
Also we are wealthier today as a nation than ever before, are standards of living cannot compare to the 1960's.
Is the new thing going to be,,,,"these people are too big to fail"
Quick looking at other peoples plate, and be thnkful for what is on yours. You want more,,,earn it.

You are absolutely right. obama won the election using the envy strategy.