NumeroUno wrote:When heybucket starts running tourney's next year our motto will be
We are only in it for the Money
anything after that is a bonus
You like it???
Yes! When will you have the t-shirts ready?
NumeroUno wrote:When heybucket starts running tourney's next year our motto will be
We are only in it for the Money
anything after that is a bonus
You like it???

Fredegar wrote:jonriv wrote:A few thoughts and questions on this quite drawn out post...
1) How was the JNT picked before? Open tryouts? Invite only?
2) Would not a JNT made of any of the top 200 players still be dominate?
3) Would not any of the top 25 TB teams have a chance to beat any JNT team(no matter how it was constituted)? - figuring a team that has played together should be better that a newly put together all-star team
4) Has any thought been given to rewarding the championship team<insert championship> with JNT status(and sponsorship) and have them represent the US? It would make championship play that much more exciting.....
Sorry, Jon, but some of your questions don't make sense.
1) Has to be invite-only. Can you imagine how many non-qualified players would show up if it was open?
2) Don't understand the question. Would they be dominant? Not as dominant as picking a team from the top 50 players. Don't get what you mean.
3) Question doesn't make sense. How could you tell if a top TB team could beat a JNT team, if their best players are ON the JNT team. Are you saying you would intentionally choose a JNT team that doesn't have the best players from the best teams?
4) Why would you reward one specific team from one specific area? Makes no sense. A JNT team should consist of the best players nation-wide. So I certainly hope that no thought has been given to this suggestion.
In general, it sounds like you're saying team chemistry would get you farther than an All-Star group of better overall players. We'll have to agree to disagree on that.
jonriv wrote:Question One was asking how was it done before the change???
Question two- I was making the point that the top 200 junior players in this country are probably better than the top ten in most others
Quest ion three was somewhat rhetorical, but the assumption being a top team
Question 4- to answer your question, was the JNT actually made from nationwide players, or a bunch of Cali players with some Texas and Arizona for good measure

PDad wrote:Question two- I was making the point that the top 200 junior players in this country are probably better than the top ten in most others
International rules allow players the choice of playing for the country of their citizenship or family heritage, so top US players not chosen for the USA team can compete for another country against them. Do you really want the best pitcher in the US playing for another country?
Trophy Hunter wrote:PDad wrote:Question two- I was making the point that the top 200 junior players in this country are probably better than the top ten in most others
International rules allow players the choice of playing for the country of their citizenship or family heritage, so top US players not chosen for the USA team can compete for another country against them. Do you really want the best pitcher in the US playing for another country?
Curious if you know how many generations does "family heritage" allow for?
PDad wrote:Do you really want the best pitcher in the US playing for another country?
Makina wrote:This is really an unfortunate farce that ASA is now pulling. The big bully on the block is now throwing it's weight around!! Now if they had announced this would affect next year Jr. team then at least it allows players to make a choice.
So this will probably create a free agent system, whereby if your team does not qualify for ASA championship level play, then you just go sign-up with a team that has qualified. What team that aspires to win would not take a top 30 player onto their roster.
If history repeats itself the Big Bully on the Block always gets beaten in the end!! I guess the best 30 players from So Cal will not be invited to the Jr. team for try-outs by the sound of this posting!

Makina wrote:This is really an unfortunate farce that ASA is now pulling. The big bully on the block is now throwing it's weight around!! Now if they had announced this would affect next year Jr. team then at least it allows players to make a choice.
So this will probably create a free agent system, whereby if your team does not qualify for ASA championship level play, then you just go sign-up with a team that has qualified. What team that aspires to win would not take a top 30 player onto their roster.
If history repeats itself the Big Bully on the Block always gets beaten in the end!! I guess the best 30 players from So Cal will not be invited to the Jr. team for try-outs by the sound of this posting!
Battle wrote:Makina wrote:This is really an unfortunate farce that ASA is now pulling. The big bully on the block is now throwing it's weight around!! Now if they had announced this would affect next year Jr. team then at least it allows players to make a choice.
So this will probably create a free agent system, whereby if your team does not qualify for ASA championship level play, then you just go sign-up with a team that has qualified. What team that aspires to win would not take a top 30 player onto their roster.
If history repeats itself the Big Bully on the Block always gets beaten in the end!! I guess the best 30 players from So Cal will not be invited to the Jr. team for try-outs by the sound of this posting!
Who is ASA "bullying"?
