I love it when the spineless announcers say the infamous 'Wow - that was close' which translates to "If I had a backbone I would say - did the Blue just blow that call or what ?"
Ok, this is a late reply. However, I can't believe there are more than 3 viewers on earth who don't agree that when a comment includes "... that was close..." it really is nothing but a precursor to a line of b.s. It's become a bit of a joke. While nailing blues for sport is not the objective, the pattern of fanny covering is well established. How about some variety? "THAT was a unique call".... "I wonder what blue saw that I didn't....." "Obviously he/she has a better view..." Doesn't make is it less b.s., just different b.s. Variety.... !
Another one is when a player makes a good play... not spectacular but good, 2 seconds of camera time and adios. If you make an error the camera focuses a close-up on the players face for 17 seconds of personal anguish with the intent of... the intent of... the point of.... well... I don't know.... I suppose there is a point but I don't know what the video director is thinking (if anything).
And, yes, if there is a particularly wholesome/attractive player in the dugout she WILL get camera time whether playing or not. Pandering to the pop culture set it required.
Oh... the "overlayed on video" strike box... following the ball that misses the box by 7 inches but is called a strike (with no swing). The announcers are typically quiet about that, not having worked up an appropriate mantra for the event. Room for advancing the art....
Ok, enough whining for the day....