SoCalASABlue wrote:All of the back and forth about pitching to Chamberlain is moot if the TN center fielder is in the correct position and doesn't allow the freaking ball to go over her head for a triple...
Fredegar wrote:SoCalASABlue wrote:All of the back and forth about pitching to Chamberlain is moot if the TN center fielder is in the correct position and doesn't allow the freaking ball to go over her head for a triple...
I disagree. OFs are in because the odds of Turang hitting a ball over their head is less likely than dropping one in, if they play deep. That strategy was working fine for them the first 11 innings. Besides, even if bases were empty, we might still be having the discussion of whether to pitch around Chamberlain. It's just more obvious when 1st base is open, winning run at 2nd, and her being at 1st would mean nothing more than setting up force-plays, double-plays, etc.
How many people would occasionally love to have 5 minutes with your college coach (or another college coach) just to ask, "Coach, honestly, what were you thinking there?"
Fredegar wrote:SoCalASABlue wrote:All of the back and forth about pitching to Chamberlain is moot if the TN center fielder is in the correct position and doesn't allow the freaking ball to go over her head for a triple...
I disagree. OFs are in because the odds of Turang hitting a ball over their head is less likely than dropping one in, if they play deep. That strategy was working fine for them the first 11 innings. Besides, even if bases were empty, we might still be having the discussion of whether to pitch around Chamberlain. It's just more obvious when 1st base is open, winning run at 2nd, and her being at 1st would mean nothing more than setting up force-plays, double-plays, etc.
How many people would occasionally love to have 5 minutes with your college coach (or another college coach) just to ask, "Coach, honestly, what were you thinking there?"
SoCalASABlue wrote:Fredegar wrote:SoCalASABlue wrote:All of the back and forth about pitching to Chamberlain is moot if the TN center fielder is in the correct position and doesn't allow the freaking ball to go over her head for a triple...
I disagree. OFs are in because the odds of Turang hitting a ball over their head is less likely than dropping one in, if they play deep. That strategy was working fine for them the first 11 innings. Besides, even if bases were empty, we might still be having the discussion of whether to pitch around Chamberlain. It's just more obvious when 1st base is open, winning run at 2nd, and her being at 1st would mean nothing more than setting up force-plays, double-plays, etc.
How many people would occasionally love to have 5 minutes with your college coach (or another college coach) just to ask, "Coach, honestly, what were you thinking there?"
I should have clarified - I was talking about the ball Martinez hit AFTER Gibson dropped the Ricketts pop fly that allowed her to get to 2B. It may have worked for the 1st ten innings but when you've just given yourself a 3 run lead with a lineup like Oklahoma's from top to bottom, the last thing I want is any ball going over my CF's head. JMHO.
Battle wrote:How fast is Brianna Turang? Wow!!
PDad wrote:Battle wrote:How fast is Brianna Turang? Wow!!
I was shocked Turang didn't score in the 3rd inning on Chamberlain's double. Gasso had to be kicking herself later in the game for holding Turang at 3rd with 2 outs.
jonriv wrote:PDad wrote:Battle wrote:How fast is Brianna Turang? Wow!!
I was shocked Turang didn't score in the 3rd inning on Chamberlain's double. Gasso had to be kicking herself later in the game for holding Turang at 3rd with 2 outs.
I was thinking that throughout the game. I think the aggressive way the the OFs converged on the ball and got it in quickly gave the 3b coach some second thoughts?