Skarp wrote:Sam wrote:How about being gracious when you are the team stud vs. being dissatisfied because everyone around you sucks. Is that coherent enough?
Actually, no...it isn't. If it's about the girl, then how about letting her decide what environment she wants to be in? And if she prefers a more competitive team over four years of being "gracious" on a team far below her ability level, who exactly are you pass judgment on that?
It is no more becoming for a D1 stud to be cocky about her skill than it is for a D3 stud to be. And it is just as appropriate for the D3 kid to seek out competition befitting her relative ability level as it is for the D1 player to do so. Your assertion to the contrary--that D3 players aren't good enough to legitimately concern themselves with such things--is belittling. Those kids might actually have the silly notion in their heads that all the years of sacrifice they endured to get as good as they are actually amount to something.
We'll have to agree to disagree. D1 studs, especially pitchers, can be extremely cocky. They were recruited and are paid to play softball in many cases. Its not unbecoming for them, it is expected. In D3, the kid isn't really recruited to play softball and the teams are little more than intramural teams that get to travel a little bit to play softball. Their facilities aren't very good and their budgets are abysmal. A kid who is cocky (my definitition: picky about who they play with and who they don't) is wholly appropriate for the recruited D1 or even D2 player. A cocky D3 player is just wierd. If she was that good, so as to be a D3 stud, she would have been recruited to play at a higher level. My view isn't belittling, it is the truth....which is what is being kept from many of these young ladies during the recruiting and signing process. The truth is that any kid going to a D3 school can try out for the team and as I said before, this kid could go to a D1 school and walk on if she is above these other players.