Travel Ball wrote:
Why don't you go ahead and educate all of us how a "criminal California Law Enforcement Telecommunications System order" works under the facts and circumstances of this statutory rape case and why this judge couldn't impose as a condition of bail an order that this coach not attend softball games, practices, etc if the judge thought him to be a danger (clearly the judge and TNL knows something you don't know). . . I'm so waiting for this explanation.
I see google is working for ya. Good for you! Not that I believe that you can grasp what I am going to tell you, since you were not able to comprehend my previous post, which is EXACTLY how this stuff goes down.. I'll try anyway.
First, you need to google up PC 136.2. This is the section of law that I was applying for this case. You will see CPO's are issued restraining from specific persons and places for specific cause. While you are googling, google up CA Judicial Council form mc-220a. With that googling, you can actually see the form and see it is very specific as to person and place. I would doubt they have enough to persuade a court to go outside the norm and issue some blanket vanilla order, especially when it is probably not even part of the case, especially at a pre prelim phase. At this point VERY LITTLE has gone on in the case.
Secondarily, he is not O/R'd. He is out on Bail. There is a big difference. Often with O/R you have certain conditions (such as a search waiver).
Doubtless there is (or soon will be) a CPO for the victim in this case since that is routine in criminal cases. I've never seen a blanket CPO issued covering issues unknown such as where a tournament may be and entire regions and unnamed groups of people as a condition of BAIL or as part of a CPO. I suppose it could happen; I've NEVER seen it and I've dealt with thousands of criminal and civil restraining orders. That type of stuff usually comes post sentencing (if by some miracle they get that far) as conditions of probation (which is probably the most he is going to get if it goes all the way.).
That is why my post was aimed at TD's doing something. I think you missed that.. A TD taking action on their own. My thinking would be for the interests of the safety of all involved participants, including even the Defendant or innocent bystanders standing next to the defendant, since not everyone takes these types of things well.
Now stop being a jerk for two seconds and read my posts and you might actually be able to learn something as to how this stuff really does work. Umpiring is hobby. Defendants are a living.



























