Sam wrote:
Your solution is not workable, Mike. Your solution is to continue destroying young girls' arms.
Holding the parents accountable for the well-being of their offspring is not workable? Well, yeah, I guess the weakness of our generation pretty much killed that. However, it is still the proper course of action.
ASA, NFHS, and everyone else will tell the catcher that they have to wear a mask when they are warming up a pitcher, even on the sidelines. I guess that should be a situation where the parents should be responsible and their shouldn't be a rule also. Where is the line drawn?
No, that rule which added no additional liability to the organizing bodies, was put into place at the demand of the participants, just like the bat standards which, even with the appropriate action, still causes sanctioning bodies and manufacturers nightmares and a hefty legal budget.
Then again, you get these morons out there demanding this and insisting on that or they will take their ball and go home, but when it comes to dealing with it.......
All the BS about the face masks on the batting helmets. THERE HAS TO BE A RULE!!! ASA MUST MAKE THESE MANDATORY FOR THE SAKE OF OUR CHILDREN! Yeah, and the minute ASA did mandate them, all the complaints appeared. "What do you mean I have to use an approved piece of equipment?" "Oh, this one is just as good as the new, its okay if she wears this one, right?" "You are going to enforce that rule?"
At an Eastern NC the year after the rule went into effect, half the teams had to visit locals sporting goods and hardware stores because they were not equiped or the equipment was so poorly installed, the helmet did not pass inspection. We are not talking about some friendly or fund raiser or league play, we are talking about a national tournament!
Again, a case of being careful what you wish for, you just may get it. However, if all these morons would have listened to folks like myself which were preaching parental responsibility and not waiting on someone else to do the job, it would have been a non-issue and the girls would still be wearing the proper equipment.
How about teams playing in the fall, with the exception of Gold, not being insured to play or practice by the organization for that time frame? That would cut the season down to 8 months instead of 12.
Well, I have no problem cutting the season. Too many, WAY TOO MANY, children are playing too much. Some don't even get a life as a child because some carrot-chasing parent has taken a gulp of the Kool Aid that some coach has sold them.
But again, that is still the issue of the parent because even if the majority of the organizations did outlaw the game for 3 months of the year, someone would just pick up the banner and run a league/conference to satisfy those who wanted to continue and the only way to stop that would be how? THE PARENTS not allowing their child to play in such leagues.
Anyone notice the Geico commercial about teaching the 5 yo to dunk in search of a scholarship? The epitome of the carrot-chasers, but cute to most of the folks watching.
Hell, I think I'll vote for Ralph Nader on the Kill Sports Scholarships platform!!