Fasterpitch wrote:Beat'n that horse..........
Yeah lets move back to the always brilliant "Who's the best 12U" discussions.
Fasterpitch wrote:Beat'n that horse..........
Demonboy wrote:Fasterpitch wrote:Beat'n that horse..........
Yeah lets move back to the always brilliant "Who's the best 12U" discussions.
jag1 wrote:Sam.........you said it ALL..!! If you can't afford travel ball, go play rec ball..!!! That means, don't EXPECT me to GIVE you money at your lousy snack bar or whatever to support YOUR kid..! Nice rationale. A team has no reason to bother to host if there's poor snack shack support. Have fun with your 400.00 tournaments. I don't expect anyone to pay for me and mine, but I've given up vacations, golf, fishing trips...ect.., and I work alot of overtime to insure my kids can play..!(these days, some people don't have a job, let alone overtime for their kids ball tournaments..!) By all means, support the host tournamnets fundraising endeavors, but don't mandate it..! Who's mandating anything? Any team is free to whip out a BBQ at a friendly. However, the host is free to not invite them back and to tell anyone who'll listen to avoid inviting the classless aholes. Freedom of choice is not free. Consequences are the payment. Live with them.
Longdisttrvlballer wrote:I hear a lot of “it’s about the girls” however it sure sounds like its about the money. It is a sad day when the criteria for getting invited back to friendly’s is based on snack bar support rather than quality of play and team sportsmanship. A team BBQ is defiantly poor judgment and Iam a advocate for supporting snack bars. But when talk of blacklisting teams for reasons other than poor coach, player or parent sportsmanship is a slippery slope that our sport shouldn’t be heading down. It is about the girls, and they don’t have control over their parents decision to support the snack bar.
