IN Softball Nut wrote:Mark 75 wrote:Softball Nut - Not sure how your came up with your criteria, but the score on the scoreboard is a nice indication. Especially when there are repeat victories over the same team. If a team backs up a win over a team with another win, then it makes sense they are better then said team.
Unless there is something I am missing? Which could be the case!
Mark 75 - It's pretty obvious that you have close ties to this team. I'm guessing your daughter is on this "top 3" team.I'll use an example to show you why I don't think they're in the top 3. Let's take the 2012 Chicago Cubs for instance.
One of the worst teams in MLB by far, and have been for years. Last year, they were somehow able to beat the St. Louis Cardinals, who made it to the NLCS, twice in a row on April 23rd and 24th last year.
Does this mean the Cubs are a better team than the Cardinals? NO!!!!!!! Same concept with the Aftermath (Cubs) and White Sox 2000 (Cardinals), buddy. Hope you can see what you are missing now. Just because you win two in a row, DOES NOT always mean that team is better.
No Blaze, that is absolutely the worst comparison for an argument ever posted.
1) consider the pitching rotation in MLB vs any level of softball.
2) what about injuries? Did the Cards have anyone out of the game?
3) what about schedule? Did the Cards just return from a long road trip?
D) blah blah blah
Maybe these teams up north are all close enough that one or two plays can swing a game.
Point is, there is no comparison to MLB.
Fact is, the record stands Aftermath 2 / Sox 0. Only IU retains the #1 ranking after a loss!
And, no, I have nothing to do with any team in NW Indiana. Although I did sleep in a Holliday Inn last night.


























