heretostay wrote:454 has two strikes against it's, they will probably be yanked from NCAA next year. Unfortunately the new Worth 454 legit is a piece if chit. NCAA give bats strikes when they fail the ncaa compression tests. A bat might pass out of the wrapper but could fail after 100 hits in a batting cage.
Worth no longer makes a good fast pitch bat
Diesels_dad wrote:heretostay wrote:454 has two strikes against it's, they will probably be yanked from NCAA next year. Unfortunately the new Worth 454 legit is a piece if chit. NCAA give bats strikes when they fail the ncaa compression tests. A bat might pass out of the wrapper but could fail after 100 hits in a batting cage.
Worth no longer makes a good fast pitch bat
do you think it (FP454) will be pulled for 2013 ASA 16u nationals?
AlwaysImprove wrote:yep, too hot for college, but fine for 16U ASA. Oh but wait, NCAA bat testing is about competition.
AlwaysImprove wrote:yep, too hot for college, but fine for 16U ASA. Oh but wait, NCAA bat testing is about competition.
UmpSteve wrote:AlwaysImprove wrote:yep, too hot for college, but fine for 16U ASA. Oh but wait, NCAA bat testing is about competition.
Man, you are like a parrot on this. AI want a bat cracker??
That bat is NOT yet proven too hot for college; there is a specific contract clause between NCAA and the manufacturers that defines the conditions of too hot for NCAA.
That bat is NOT yet proven too hot for ASA; there is a specific contract clause between ASA and the manufacturers that defines the conditions of too hot for ASA.
In neither case has that bat failed the conditions in the contract. And the two separate contracts do NOT rely on the other for satisfying the conditions. And, frankly, neither one gives a shit if it meets your approval, they are what they are.
You claim to be an intelligent person knowledgeable about much, including legal matters. Why is this concept too difficult for you to grasp?