coolstuff wrote:I have seen a batter called out because the batter entered the dugout before her AB was completed, and I've seen it more than once, at different age levels, in both NSA and ASA sanctioned games. I'm not quoting the rule book, just sharing what I have seen.

hit4power wrote:Isnt it the case that under NFHS (and ASA?) blue could ring her up for taking too long to get back in the box? I forget the time, but it's something like 10-15'seconds once F1 has the ball and is ready for the next pitch. Had this happen when DD was pitching in HS - batter went and sat down on strike 2. When OC realized what has happening he rushed her back out, but blue called strike 3 on her for not being ready in time.
GIMNEPIWO wrote:Once the ball has been returned to the pitcher, the batter has 10 seconds to get set or the umpire may call a strike on her, and after the pitchers hands are brought together, if the batter leaves the batters box she runs the risk of having a strike called on her for being out of position ( 7-3-1 ).
Crabby_Bob wrote:GIMNEPIWO wrote:Once the ball has been returned to the pitcher, the batter has 10 seconds to get set or the umpire may call a strike on her, and after the pitchers hands are brought together, if the batter leaves the batters box she runs the risk of having a strike called on her for being out of position ( 7-3-1 ).
7.3.C: The batter must take the batter's position in the batter's box within 10 seconds after being directed to do so by the umpire. EFFECT: The umpire will call a strike. No pitch has to be thrown and the ball is dead.
7.3.D (paraphrasing) would elict a warning or strike called for both feet out of the box when none of the eight exceptions are met. It doesn't say must warn first before calling a strike. I've seen it both ways.
If my batter walks into the dugout before her at-bat is complete, she will always be reminded to "know the count". If the umpire has not directed the batter to take the batter's box and calls strike three in a crucial game situation, why shouldn't I protest? (The $100 fee is one reason, violating 7.3.D would be another.)