by slapperdad » Tue Jul 26, 2011 5:55 am
After watching most of the games my observations were:
1. I enjoyed watching younger players develop and learn how to deal with international competition. Does having our nation's best players pound other teams really serve the purpose of growing Softball? Does it serve the purpose of getting the game back in the Olympics? Part of the allure of the Olympics for me, was always having our amateur athletes face the best the world has to offer. Am I the only one who thinks watching the "Dream Team IX" beat Latvia 135-47 sucks and serves no purpose? Had the US used professional players in 80, the "miracle" would never have happened.
2. I love Coach Erikson's coaching style, I wish my style was more like his.
3. Mixed international officiating crews will never work out well. One of the key components to having a good crew is communication, the problem with that is obvious. Communication however has nothing to do with missing routine calls, I'm hoping they just had a bad night, rather than putting less than the best on the field in the name of gender/racial equality. I'd say the call at 3rd was 50/50, there wasn't a really good camera angle, I'll give the PU the benefit of the doubt, but not putting the batter/runner on first was simply not performing under pressure, and inexcusable in my opinion.
Every man lives by a code:
1.Always look cool
2.Never get lost
3.If you get lost, look cool