sball14 wrote:
let's not use semantics in your argument.
question?
wade, do you believe a softball can curve upward? yes or no
That is a very good question Mr. Flat earth scientist.
Allow me to explain my position.
I in fact do not believe in, what I will call the jofus pitch (not to be confused with the eephus pitch (probably also impossible according to our voodoo scientists))

I am; however, a firm believer in the rise ball.

With your trained scientist eye, you cannot see the rising ball in Sarah's pitch?
Those of you using baseball studies should understand that a softball is not a base ball and the over handed downwards delivery of a baseball is not comparable to a underhanded upwards trajectory delivery. A big difference is in this case, the softball ball is already moving up. The forces of upward movement are already in place. Are you arguing spin cannot affect that?
Thats not some obscure image. I googled for the image you guys told me disproved the rise ball . I dont think they are experts or that that categorically proves or disproves anything, but if you guys are going to quote evidence and studies, I would steer clear of the sarah thing in the future.