Ifubuildit wrote:The sound of the bat ringing after a good solid hit...
Man you must be old school! No boom boxes OR composite bats!?!?!?
Ifubuildit wrote:The sound of the bat ringing after a good solid hit...
Sabertooth wrote:We really like our guns here in Texas. Maybe you could put a target on the side of your Boom Box??? We can end the debate quickly. No need to involve the TD.
Then we can go back to playing softball.
denver_dog wrote:freedom, freedom, freedom, now taking the boom box away! What we losing next?

Merlin wrote:Every High School softball game and every College game I have been to plays music between innings.
At the Hall of Fame Tournament... guess what... They played music between each inning...
Are you going to turn down a Scholarship to a college if they play music between innings?
dueceduece wrote:Merlin wrote:Every High School softball game and every College game I have been to plays music between innings.
At the Hall of Fame Tournament... guess what... They played music between each inning...
Are you going to turn down a Scholarship to a college if they play music between innings?
Not the same thing and you know it. There aren't other games going on as they roll a boom box through the complex as loud as it can go. I don't think the majority of people have a problem with it between innings as long as it isn't so loud as to disturb other games.

DonnieS wrote:
Its called being considerate - still exists to some extent here in Texas.
Spazsdad wrote:Skarp wrote:denver_dog wrote:freedom, freedom, freedom, now taking the boom box away! What we losing next?
And what about my freedom from being aurally assaulted by the crap you call music? I guess that doesn't count. Your freedom to punch me ends at the tip of my nose, and the same goes for your boombox and my ears.
That is the great forgotten point about freedom of (fill in the blank). Too many people think it means "I can do whatever, say whatever, I want with no regard for anyone else. No one lives in a vacuum, and even our rights and freedoms have to have boundaries.

Skarp wrote:Spazsdad wrote:Skarp wrote:denver_dog wrote:freedom, freedom, freedom, now taking the boom box away! What we losing next?
And what about my freedom from being aurally assaulted by the crap you call music? I guess that doesn't count. Your freedom to punch me ends at the tip of my nose, and the same goes for your boombox and my ears.
That is the great forgotten point about freedom of (fill in the blank). Too many people think it means "I can do whatever, say whatever, I want with no regard for anyone else. No one lives in a vacuum, and even our rights and freedoms have to have boundaries.
Another way of stating this is that every individual "right" imposes a corresponding obligation on everyone else. In the case of loud, obnoxious music, if someone has a right to play it whenever, wherever, and as loud as they want, everyone else is obligated to tolerate it. So in response to those who cry "freedom, freedom, freedom," I would argue that this is hardly a freedom-maximizing arrangement. Quite the contrary.
